Tourist Attraction : Positive and Negative Effects
Business organizations need to engage in collective social responsibility ( CSR ) to improve the experiences of community member and stay sustainable . The selected suit describes a party that signify to spread a tourist attraction first step . However , some of the involved stakeholders are unwilling to support the thought . This description examine the positive and negative effect of the thought to the horde community .
The motion to launch the tourist attraction in the selected town is capable of introduce several positivist impact . First , the motion will create task opportunities for more masses in the neighborhood and improve their income levels . Such a development is potential since the beneficiaries will have additional opportunity to sell various items and foodstuffs to the visitor ( Goeldner & Ritchie , 2011 ) . Some community member will live involved at once to render transportation services to tourist . These examples mean that the citizens of the city will record increased income floor .
Second , most of the community member will acquire diverse idea for doing occupation . Such an outcome cost potential since some of the visitors could relate positively with the local citizen and learn fresh concepts from one another . Third , the idea of tourism could oblige more company to start their own initiatives and maximize the level of tourism in the identified city ( Goeldner & Ritchie , 2011 ) . Consequently , more member of the destination community will get new chore opportunities and translate their life . For example , some of the individuals could start to manufacture collector ’ s items and creative artworks for the tourist . The city will finally enter positivist economic outcomes .
On the other hand , tourism cost one of the economic activity that could lead in negative impact and worsen the experiences of people in the community . First , the initiative could affect the integrity of the natural environment due to the anticipated growth in the per centum of visitors . For example , this outcome could cost associated with the motive to additional roads construction in order to meet the demands of tourism ( Goeldner & Ritchie , 2011 ) . Another example cost that the individuals could pollute the environment through continuous littering . These issues explain why some of the stakeholders could be opposed to the suggested decision of launching the intended tourist attraction initiative .
Second , the level of insecurity could increase since the city would turn home to additional visitors whose intentions might be strange . Some of the attracted tourist in the city could exist thieves and fraud . Such an occurrence can result in insecurity and discourage more masses from engage their economical objective . These potential outcomes will regard the wider community in a negative fashion . Additionally , the neighborhood might go through high level of breeze pollution , effluent discharge , and destruction of vegetation cover ( Goeldner & Ritchie , 2011 ) . These challenge explain why the participation of all key stakeholders is essential to support the preparation of in effect policy to dictate the future of tourism in the city .
The above discussion has identify tourism as an important economy action that can transform the experience of more citizens in a given society in a positive style . All key stakeholders should cooperate to ensure that the suggested actions live engage diligently to minimize the negative impacts that could be recorded . These measurement will advance those who cost opposed to the idea to change their brain and make the tourism first step sustainable .
Reference
Goeldner , C. , & Ritchie , J . ( 2011 ) .Tourism : Principles , pattern , and philosophy( 12thed. ) . John Wiley & Sons .
