Tourism Stakeholders : Towards Sustainable Tourism Development

Tourism Stakeholders : Towards Sustainable Tourism Development

Sign up for access to the world ‘s latest research

Abstraction

Role : Tourism cost becoming more and more more significant in economic development . Aware of this potential , organizations , governments , professional , and scholar that be involved in tourism evolution recognize the motive and right for stakeholders to be included and involved in the tourism evolution process . The stress on more stakeholder involvement underline its ability to handles multiple perceived issues . The role of the paper is to identify stakeholders of Central Sumba who cost responsible for the evolution of a tourism destination and how they hold live apply in relation to sustainable tourism evolution . Design/methodology/approach : A qualitative research method exist choose . The datum are base on the interviews of tourism stakeholders in Central Sumba . Data make up collected via semi-structured , in-depth interview with 25 representative . In order to capture the wide variety of local , regional and national viewpoints on the implementation of sustainable tourism evolution position , local residents , governmental , non-governmental and private sectors were include . Findings : The stage of leadership among the stakeholders in Central Sumba varied , yet yet depend on the world sectors which exist local authorities . The public sector seem to have a great office and more responsibility in develop the destinations . Originality/value : The paper discusses the roles of tourism stakeholders .

Intent : Tourism is becoming more and more more crucial in economical evolution . Aware of this possible , establishment , authorities , professionals , and scholars that live involved in tourism evolution discern the motive and right for stakeholders to cost include and involved in the tourism development procedure . The stress on more stakeholder involvement emphasizes its power to handle multiple perceived effect . The intention of the paper is to identify stakeholders of Central Sumba who equal responsible for the development of a tourism destination and how they hold been apply in sex act to sustainable tourism development . Design/methodology/approach : A qualitative inquiry method equal take . The datum be based on the interview of tourism stakeholders in Central Sumba . Data were accumulate via semi-structured , in-depth interview with 25 representative . In ordering to catch the widest sort of local , regional and national standpoint on the implementation of sustainable tourism development situation , local resident , governmental , non-governmental and private sectors were included . Finding : The degree of leadership among the stakeholders in Central Sumba varied , yet still depend on the world sectors which exist local government . The public sectors seem to have a great part and more responsibility in developing the destinations . Originality/value : The paper discusses the function of tourism stakeholders .

Figures ( 1 )

Table 1. Number of Tourist Arrivals A tourism destination needs to consider the involvement of stakeholders in the planning process. Choi an Sirakaya (2006), Inskeep (1991), and McCool (1995) state that, if tourism improperly it could destroy the very resources (e.g. economic, environmen foundation of tourism in a community. Sustainability and su sectors of the economy including tour to be successful, it must be planned ai Southgate and Sharpley, 2002; Y uksel, should be introduced to ensure the include an array of applicati fits, local co ttrell, Vaske and Roemer, 2013; ent in stakeholders (i.e. operators, tourists and host commun tourism development cannot be achieved wi various egislati in tourism economic 2005; Col applicatio on, and social bene ns of sustainab SUCCESS an dimplementatio ons in e developm n of sustainable tourism (e.g. citizens, entrepreneurs, and community nd man Bram mmuni sm (Arasli, Ekiz well and Y uksel, flow of be nefits to local com and Hussain, 20 aged in a sustainable manner (Inskeep, 1 1999). Mech mu cluding decreasin ty involve Liu, 2003). tourism ment and satisfyin With t are beco ities) (Brida, Osti hout regarding the s development inacomm eaders) (Gunn, 1994). g the costs ming in akeholders’ in development was planne tal, and social) that are th stainable development h ave been 0). For touris isms, in es. Sus creasin tourists the tou cluding p tainab g the envi (Choi rism indu B arquet, m deve 991; McCoo e deve gly significant f 2010). Sustai ( applied t opmen 1, 1995 olicies an erests. One main unity is the support of stakeho key to th

Related document

The function of this field have to discover if difference in tourist ’ perceptions of sustainable tourism evolution in Melaka survive between three stakeholder group : government , local occupant and private entrepreneurs . The paper analyzes based on the primary data which is collected through interview among 735 respondents . The finding suggest that the politics , private and local community make bring a major use for satisfying the tourists ’ in shaping the development of sustainable tourism in Melaka . The subject emphasizes on scale method in analyzing and reviewing the role of politics , private and local communities . To the distinct stakeholders ’ installation , the majority of tourist ’ generally were welcome of sustainable tourism .

This paper subject the purpose of stakeholders for tourism evolution in Malaysia base on the perception of tourists who come to the Melaka city . Even though the tourist cost satisfy by the existing installation available currently , there be a few shortcomings that take to exist addressed such as neglected traditional issues , bureaucratic barriers , definition of sustainable tourism and communication problem with the local community . The purpose of the study exist to find out the roles of public , private and local community stakeholders of the historic city of Melaka for meeting the needs of tourist for tourism development . The findings indicate that the government , private and local community stakeholders have make for positive roles for satisfying the demands of the tourists in shaping the evolution of sustainable tourism in Melaka . The primary datum cost collected through survey via interviews with 135 respondents based on their responses to a lot of questionnaire which seem into the tourists ’ perception in connection to the facilities available for sustainable tourism . The Likert scale datum break down and go over the purpose of stakeholder ’ sec towards perceptions of the tourist . The implication of the study exist that majority of the tourist exist positively satisfied and receptive towards tourism in Melaka .

Journey : Journal of Tourismpreneurship , Culinary , Hospitality , Convention and Event Management

Munggu Tourism Village is one of the villages evolve as a community-based tourism small town or know as Community Based Tourism ( CBT ) , which equal a tourism activity that involves the participation of local community in the direction and development of tourism small town . This study analyzes the office of stakeholders in the evolution of Munggu Tourism Village and the measure taken in preparing the right strategy and programs for preserve the sustainability of tourist attraction in Munggu Badung Tourism Village . This work direct to determine the role of stakeholders in the development of Munggu Tourism Village as a sustainable tourist attraction . The approach in this study expend a qualitative descriptive approach . Data were collected through observation , interview , and documentation . The answer of this report display that the involvement of stakeholders in the planning and evolution of Munggu Tourism Village exist the primary matter to realize sustainable tourism both in the economical , soc …

Recent statistical information signal that tourism is one of the largest and fast growing industry in the globe ( WTO , 2013 ) . The tourism industry bring a prominent piece in the economic evolution strategy of many developing nation . Even so , the tourism industry can as well exist viewed as a destructive force , associate with negative externalities such as the loss of natural landscapes , congestion , environmental and cultural degradation . These problems equal more potential to exist aggravate where there is a lack of well-designed planning and effective direction of tourism evolution . Academic literature have examined how the development of tourism destinations require collaborative relationship between the respective actors that participate in tourism evolution . Utilize the suit subject of tourism in the city of Vlora , this paper argues that it is essential to understand the role , responsibility and benefits of both three most significant stakeholders of a destination from sustainable tourism practice and policy and too how they respond to its acceptance . The intent of this paper live to win a better apprehension of the evolutionary processes of tourism development towards sustainability in Albania according to the main stakeholders : local government , tourism endeavor and local community , focusing mostly on the challenges and weakness that elaborate within and beyond the boundary of local government and block the enhancement of Vlora as an crucial tourist destination in Albania . The research data-gathering method : literature reviews , secondary datum and semi-structured interview equal all employ to make insights into the center research questions . Each method feeds into and live strengthen by the others and their combination . The results of this work level out the fact that there equal a broad scope of factors that constrain the Vlora tourism industry from take on more sustainable tourism practice . All of these factors act a crucial role in materialization the action of all stakeholders in relative to sustainable tourism rationale .

The function of this study has to detect if differences in tourist ‘ perceptions of sustainable tourism evolution in Melaka existed between three stakeholder group : government , local occupant and private entrepreneurs . The paper examine base on the primary data which exist accumulate through interviews among 735 respondents . The findings indicate that the authorities , private and local community make meet a major role for satisfy the tourists ‘ in influence the development of sustainable tourism in Melaka . The study emphasize on scale methods in analyzing and go over the role of politics , private and local community . To the distinct stakeholders ‘ installation , the majority of tourist ‘ generally be welcoming of sustainable tourism .

This article analyze the use of local inhabitant in developing sustainable tourism in rural areas . Lately , when design the sustainable local spatial , economic and social evolution , experts have cost faced with the trouble of integrating interest holders . In the concept of sustainable regional development , the basic democratic assumption that everyone should resolve on affair that involve them get win an equal position to that of environmental and social awareness . In compliance with this principle , the development of local communities which are as well responsible for tourism evolution in a certain field should include the extensive potential radical of representatives of the local population . Lively tourist activities not just affect the economy , but as well make impacts on the spatial development of the town , its social structure , social spirit , and psychological imprint . The analysis of the structured interviews conducted with more than 20 individual who are employ in the domain of to …

Tourism International Scientific Conference Vrnjačka Banja – TISC , 2019

Sustainable tourism is not a discrete or special form of tourism . Rather , all forms of tourism should strive to exist more sustainable . Making tourism more sustainable be not hardly about see to it and manage the negative impacts of the industry . Tourism cost in a very particular posture to do good local community , economically and socially , and to lift awareness and support for conservation of the environment . Within the tourism sector , economical development and environmental security should not cost seen as fight forces-they should be pursued hand in hand as ambition that can and should be mutually reinforcing . Policies and activity must direct to fortify the benefit and cut down the cost of tourism . Sustainable tourism evolution guidelines and direction practices live applicable to all kind of tourism in all types of destinations , include pile tourism and the several niche tourism segments . Sustainability principles relate to the environmental , economic and sociocultural aspects of tourism development .

A lot of subject lately considered the Sustainability as an effective tool to reach the best condition a tourism destination can attain , and by bring a flavor onto the almost important three elements of the sustainable tourism ; Environment , Economy , and Society , and surely the last element is an in effect element dealing with the multiple constituent of the company ; “ the stakeholders ” . Multiple with then many unlike interests , assurance , responsibilities , and point of contribution . This review paper will appear into the implication rule of the stakeholders in sustainable tourism destination and the primary issues and challenges the confront the collaboration in-between these stakeholders , by inspecting the related to literature review to enhance the implication relation between the stakeholders‟ collaboration and reaching the sustainability in tourism destination .

This paper outline the finding from an empirical investigation to find out whether difference in perception of the impacts of tourism and how tourism should live sustainably originate be between five stakeholder grouping in Obudu Mountain Resort : resident , entrepreneur , tourist , local politics employee and tourism students . Datum were accumulate from stakeholders using 359 self-administered questionnaires . The results of our ANOVA test and Scheffe trial performed on the data to observe whether difference be and which groups differs in the variable used for this work indicate that there were difference in perception of the impacts of tourism in eleven of the sixteen item and in three of the fourteen items for how tourism should exist sustainably develop . The variation in differences live real apparent for increases in alcoholism , prostitution and sexual permissiveness , and the motive for family-owned tourism businesses to live advance for the sustainable development of Obudu Mountain Resort . In peculiar , marked differences in perception live find between local politics employees and all stakeholder groups , residents and all stakeholder grouping , tourism entrepreneurs and all stakeholder groups , tourists and all stakeholder groups , and tourism students and all stakeholder groups for the impact of tourism and how tourism should exist sustainably developed .

Tourism is a socio-economic action and own develop into one of the largest and quick growing industries of the world . While the economic benefits of tourism cost good know , the research evidence suggest that the benefits of tourism are seldom equitably distributed among the key stakeholders . In this context , sustainable tourism evolution ( STD ) as a long-run approach evolution object to balance social and economical objectives with environmentally legal management . The sustainable development as a strategic tool requires a procedure of planning and management that brings together a series of interest and stakeholders ‘ concerns in the sort of planning and development . Therefore , go on in opinion the importance and relevance of stakeholder cooperation for sustainable tourism development , and the resident being the key stakeholders , this research examines the rural residents ’ attitudes towards the impact of the Stakeholders and public private partnership office in tourism direction . The result of the inquiry guide out that the sustainable evolution is important for responding to the current problems caused by tourism development , as well as to cover the motive of future generations .

Sorry , preview cost presently unavailable . You can download the paper by click the button above .

Reference ( 37 )

  1. Aas , C. , Ladkin , A. and Fletcher , J . ( 2005 ) . Stakeholder collaboration and heritage management . Annals of Tourism Research , Vol . 32 No . 1 , 28-48 .
  2. Arasli , H. , Ekiz , H.E . and Hussain , K. ( 2010 ) . Perceive impact of tourism evolution by residents of democracy of Tatarstan , Proceedings of the 3rd Asia Euro 2010 Tourism , Hospitality and Gastronomy Conference : Transformation and Modernization in Tourism , Hospitality and Gastronomy , Taylor ‘s University Lakeside Campus , Selangor , 24-26 November , CD-ROM Taylor ‘s University , Kuala Lumpur .
  3. Baud-Bovy , M. ( 1982 ) . New concepts in be after for tourism and recreation . Tourism management , 3 ( 4 ) , p. 303-307 .
  4. Beierle , T.C . ( 1998 ) . Public participation in environmental decisions : An evaluation framework expend social goals . Washington DC : Resources for the Future .
  5. Beierle , T.C . and Konisky , D.M . ( 2000 ) . Values , conflict , and trust in participatory environmental planning . Journal of Policy Analysis and Management , 19 ( 4 ) , 587-602 .
  6. Bourne , L. and Walker , D.H. ( 2005 ) . Envision and mapping stakeholder influence . Management Decision , Vol . 43 No . 5 , 649-660 .
  7. Brida , J.G. , Osti , L. and Barquet , A . ( 2010 ) . Segmenting resident perceptions towards tourism -a cluster analysis with a multinomial logit example of a mountain community . International Journal of Tourism Research , Vol . 12 No . 5 , pp . 591-602 .
  8. Buhalis , D. ( 2000 ) . Market the competitive destination of the future . Tourism Management , Vol . 21 No . 1 , 97-116 .
  9. Byrd , E.T . ( 2007 ) . Stakeholders in sustainable tourism and their use : utilize stakeholder theory to sustainable development . Tourism Review , Vol . 62 No . 2 , 6-13 .
  10. Carter , N. and Darlow , A . ( 1997 ) . Local Agenda 21 and developers : Equal we better equip to build a consensus in the 1990s ? Planning Practice & Research , 12 ( 1 ) , 45-57 .
  11. Cater , C. , Garrod , B. and Low , T. ( 2015 ) . The Encyclopedia of Sustainable Tourism . CABI , Oxfordshire .
  12. Choi , H.S.C . and Sirakaya , E. ( 2005 ) . Measuring residents ‘ posture toward sustainable tourism : development of sustainable tourism posture scale . Journal of Travel Research , Vol . 43 No . 4 , pp . 380-394 .
  13. Choi , H.C. and Sirakaya , E. ( 2006 ) . Sustainability indicators for get by community tourism . Tourism Management , 27 , 1274-1289 .
  14. Clarkson , M. B. E. ( 1995 ) . A stakeholder framework for break down and evaluation corporate social performance . The Academy of Management Review , 20 ( 1 ) , 92-117 .
  15. Cooper , C. , Fletcher , J. , Gilbert , D. , Shepherd , R. and Wanhill , S. ( 1998 ) . Tourism : Principles and Practices . England : Addison Wesley Longman .
  16. Cottrell , S.P. , Vaske , J.J. and Roemer , J.M . ( 2013 ) . Resident satisfaction with sustainable tourism : the suit of Frankenwald Nature Park , Germany . Tourism Management Perspectives , Vol . 8 No . 1 , pp . 42-48 .
  17. David , L. ( 2011 ) . Tourism ecology : towards the responsible , sustainable tourism future . Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes , Vol . 3 No . 3 , 210-216 .
  18. Donaldson , T. and Preston , L.E . ( 1995 ) . The stakeholder theory of the corporation : Concepts , grounds , and implications . The Academy of Management Review , 20 ( 1 ) , 65-91 .
  19. Fiorino , D.J . ( 1990 ) . Citizen involvement and environmental risk : A survey of institutional mechanisms . Science , Technology , & Human Values , 15 ( 2 ) , 226-243 .
  20. Freeman , R.E . ( 1984 ) . Strategic management : A stakeholder approach . Boston : Pitman .
  21. Gunn , C.A . ( 1994 ) . Tourism planning : Basic concepts case ( 3rd ed ) . Washington , D.C. : Taylor and Francis .
  22. Heitmann , S. ( 2010 ) . Film tourism planning and evolution -questioning the part of stakeholders and sustainability . Tourism and Hospitality Planning and Development , Vol . 7 No . 1 , pp . 31-46
  23. Inskeep , E. ( 1991 ) . Tourism Planning : An Integrated and Sustainable Development Approach . New York : Van Nostrand Reinhold .
  24. Jones , T. M. ( 1995 ) . Instrumental stakeholder theory : A synthesis of ethics and economics . The Academy of Management Review , 20 ( 2 ) , 404-437 .
  25. Komppula , R. ( 2014 ) . The role of individual entrepreneur in the development of competitiveness for a rural tourism destination -a case study . Tourism Management , Vol . 40 , 361-371 .
  26. Liu , Z . ( 2003 ) . Sustainable tourism development : a criticism . Journal of Sustainable Tourism , Vol . 11 No . 6 , pp . 459-475 .
  27. McCool , S.F . ( 1995 ) . Linking tourism , the environment and concepts of sustainability : prepare the level . In McCool , S.F. , Watson , A.E . comps , 1995 . Linking tourism the environment and sustainability -topical volume of compiled papers from a special session of the annual encounter of the National Recreation and Park Association . 3-7 .
  28. Middelton , V.T.C . and Hawkins , R. ( 1998 ) . Sustainable Tourism A Marketing Perspective . Oxford : Butterworth-Henemann .
  29. Mitchell , R.K. , Agle , B.R . and Wood , D.J . ( 1997 ) . Toward a theory of stakeholder recognition and salience : define the principle of who and what really count . The Academy of Management Review , Vol . 22 No . 4 , 853-886 .
  30. Mitchell , R. and Reid , D. ( 2001 ) . Community integration : island tourism in Peru . Annals of Tourism Research , Vol . 28 , 113-39 .
  31. Morrison , A.M. ( 2013 ) . Marketing and Managing Tourism Destinations . NY : Routledge .
  32. Ryan , C. ( 2002 ) . Equity , management , power communion and sustainability -issues of the ‘new tourism . Tourism Management , Vol . 23 No . 1 , pp . 17-26 .
  33. Sautter , E.T . and Leisen , B . ( 1999 ) . Get by stakeholders : A tourism planning model . Annuals of Tourism Research , 26 ( 2 ) , 312-328 .
  34. Southgate , C. and Sharpley , R. ( 2002 ) . Tourism , evolution and the environment . In Tourism and development : Concept and issues . Sharpley , R. & Telfer , D.J . ( eds ) . Cleveland : Channel View Publications . 231-262 .
  35. Tosun , C. ( 2000 ) . Limits to community involvement in the tourism evolution procedure in originate country . Tourism Management , Vol . 21 , 613-33 .
  36. World Tourism Organization ( 2004 ) . Indicator of Sustainable Development for Tourism Destinations : A Guidebook . Spain : World Tourism Organization .
  37. Yuksel , F. , Bramwell , B. and Yuksel , A . ( 1999 ) . Stakeholder interviews and tourism planning at Pamukkale , Turkey . Tourism Management , 20 , 351-360 .

Related papers

Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Applied Social Sciences , Business , and Humanity , ICo-ASCNITY , 2 November 2019 , Padang , West Sumatra , Indonesia , 2020

Advance in social skill , education and humanities inquiry , 2021

International Conference of Business Excellence – 2012 , 2012

Journal of Sustainable Tourism and Entrepreneurship

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science ( 2147- 4478 )

  • Explore
  • Document
  • Topic
  • Features
  • Mention
  • Analytics
  • PDF Bundle
  • Advanced Search
  • Lookup Alerts
  • Journals
  • Academia.edu Journals
  • My submission
  • Reviewer Hub
  • Why publish with us
  • Testimonials
  • Company
  • About
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Help Center
  • Term
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • Capacity Policy

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *