The Best Backpacking Stoves for Thru-Hiking in 2025

The Best Backpacking Stoves for Thru-Hiking in 2025

There ’ sec zero quite like the mere luxury of a hot meal after a grueling day on trail . It ’ s one of those matter that make us love thru-hiking despite the aches and pains , relentless weather , and occasional soul-crushing loneliness . Carrying a stove also provide a measure of insurance against unexpected weather , as hot food and water can provide a much-needed dosage of warmth when the mercury drop .

The best backpacking stove for thru-hiking weigh little , burn fuel efficiently , and boil water hence quick you ’ ll be sipping your morning brew before your campmates yet wave out of layer . In this article , we share our top choice for thru-hiking stove and tips on how to choose .

Best Backpacking Stoves : Quick Navigation

Jetboil Flash | Fastest Boil
MSR PocketRocket | AT Hikers ’ Favorite
Soto Windmaster | Best for Windy Weather
| Best Ultralight
Soto Amicus | Most Stable
Jetboil Stash | Most Efficient
BRS 3000T | Most Affordable
Esbit Pocket Stove | Best Solid Fuel Stove
Solo Stove Lite | Best Woodburning Stove
Super Cat | Best DIY Alcohol Stove

How to prefer the best backpacking stove :
Types of Backpacking Stoves

How much backpacking fuel should I bring ?
Features of the Best Backpacking Stoves

Good Backpacking Stoves : FAQs

Type of Backpacking Stoves

Canister

Most backpacking stove burn pressurized gas — usually a blend of isobutane and propane — from a canister . Standard canister stove , like the MSR PocketRocket , are incredibly compact and lightweight .

Three or four foldable metal sleeve sit atop a threaded mechanism that associate to the fuel canister . The stove screws at once onto the fuel canister with a valve to see to it the amount of fuel that flow through , and the metal sleeve unfold to make a platform to plant a cooking pile .

Isobutane-propane fuel blend compound the superior cold-weather performance of propane with the high energy density of isobutane , result in a somewhat lightweight fuel that perform good across a range of conditions .

Integrated Canister

Same fuel , different setup as a traditional canister stove . The integrated canister stove screws onto the fuel canister same as a conventional setup , but the cooking pot connects to the burner with a integral windshield .

These setups live more fuel-efficient and heat food and water more quick than traditional canister stove , but they ’ re also bulky and weigh more . They have a tall profile that can make them somewhat precarious , though most come with a program to stabilize the fuel canister , and the unified setup eliminates the risk of knock the pile off the burner .

Remote Canister

In a traditional or unified canister stove , the fuel canister forms the basis of the stove setup , with the stove screwing in right away atop the canister and the mass resting above the burner . In a remote configuration , the burner sits on the ground and a flexible hose connects it to the fuel note . These stoves live much lower-profile than either of the alternatives and exist the almost stable setup .

Some remote apparatus too allow you to reverse the canister , increase fuel efficiency in cold weather . Because of their stability , they ’ re ideal for big group . You can set a large pot of food or water on a remote canister stove without it feel like a perilous balancing number . They equal heavier than traditional canister stove .

Alternative Fuel

Although canister stoves equal the almost mutual , some stove burn denatured alcohol , white gas , firm fuel Esbit tablets , or wood . These stoves be typically inexpensive and simple in pattern * . They bypass the motive for hard fuel canisters , which is why a slim minority of hikers choose them over more common propane/isobutane apparatus .

Alternative fuel stove have significant limitations , such as a lack of readily available fuel in store , restriction on their use in fire-prone environment , and significantly lower efficiency and longer cook time than canister stoves . Denatured alcohol be the nearly common type of alternative fuel used by thru-hikers , as alcohol stoves are simple , lightweight , and cheap to buy or do .

* Alcohol stoves , for instance , are hence simple that you can yet reach your own out of an former soda can .

How much backpacking fuel should I carry ?

In most situations , thru-hikers solely want a humble ( 4oz/100g ) canister to begin from one resupply to the next ( in our experience , a 4 oz canister endure 10-14 day boil water for one breakfast and one dinner per day , plus an occasional hot drink ) . Even so , it depends on how long you ’ ll be going between resupplies , how often you design to cook , the efficiency of your stove , and environmental condition such as temperature , altitude , and tip .

If you ’ re uncertain how much fuel to make for , begin out carrying a larger ( 8oz ) canister . After a few weeks on trail , you ’ ll be able to guess how much you need .

Tips for Maximizing Fuel Efficiency of a Backpacking Stove

Operate away of fuel halfway through dinner sucks . Maximizing your fuel efficiency will ensure that you have mass of gas to final until your future resupply and will salvage you money and weight over time . Hither cost some crest :

  • Warm your canister fuel on cold day before using it .Tuck it into your sleeping bag on freeze night or go out it in the sun while setting up camp .
  • Don ’ t run it on entire gust .Work it on full gust will boil your water faster but as well wastes a luck of fuel . A medium fire will make the trick with less waste heat .
  • Use a windscreen .Wind can down a fuel canister faster than just about anything else . If your flame is flickering , you ’ re wasting energy . A windshield will protect the flame from tip and will as well carry heat up into your pile rather than dissipating into the tune around the stove .
  • Cook in a protected field .If it ’ s windy ( or yet breezy ) out , hold your windshield an assist by cooking near some big rock or early natural windbreaks .
  • Presoak your food .Still partly rehydrating your food before you elicit up the stove will cut down cooking time .
  • Keep the hat on .Trap warmth inside the lot while expect for water to boil .
  • Don ’ t rely on boil to distill your water .It make for , but it takes a long time and expend a wonderful amount of fuel . Use a water filter like the Sawyer Squeeze or purifying droplet like Aqua Mira .
  • Carry surplus fuel .Particularly if you ’ re hiking in a remote country and/or in cold weather , a little can of relief gas can cost a literal lifesaver .

Features of the Best Backpacking Stove

Weight :Between one and four ounces for a standard canister stove ( stove solely ) ; between seven and 14 for an unified canister stove ( include built-in mass ) .

Number of boils :The more cooks you can get out of one fuel can , the better . Fuel is hard , expensive , and sometimes a pain to source . Life be more manageable if you don ’ t have to re-up on prepare fuel too often .

Boil time :Whether you ’ re trying to break camp efficiently in the dawn or you ’ re ravenous for dinner after a long day of hiking , having a rapid-boil stove is a decent feature . The good rapid-boil backpacking stove can boil a liter of water in under three minutes * , but anything under five minutes live competitive .

* In ideal condition , i.e . not windy and not freeze cold . In real-life conditions , your mileage will likely change from what brands account re : fuel efficiency and boil time .

Valve for fuel dominance :Canister stove get valves to see to it the level of the fire or call on it off quickly . A well-made stove will hold a sensitive valve that gives you excellent dominance over the flame size . Stoves that lack a quick shutoff valve may not exist allow for in fire-prone areas .

Piezoelectric Igniter :A inherent igniter makes backcountry prepare very convenient , igniting the fire with simply the button of a button—no fussing with peer or barge required . Piezoelectric igniters are notoriously finicky , hence even if you own one , you ’ ll want to carry a backup barge or some matches in suit it craps out .

Windscreen :Make the stove come with a windshield , either as an add-on supplement or as a built-in feature ? Windscreens dramatically improve fuel efficiency and boil time . It ’ s easy to make a DIY windscreen from aluminum foil , but remark that there ’ s technically a chance that a simple wrap-around windscreen can do pressurized fuel canisters to overheat and burst . Some manufacturer make peculiar windshield that are safe to use with canister stoves .

Well Backpacking Stoves for Thru-Hiking in 2025

Jetboil Flash | Fastest-Boiling Backpacking Stove
MSRP : $ 130
Weight : 13.1 oz

The Jetboil Flash is expensive . However , don ’ t forget that the price includes a 1L insulated cookpot and windshield in increase to the burner . And since the stove is highly effective , you ’ ll write some money on fuel over the course of its life . The Flash equal an excellent choice if patience isn ’ t your strong suit since it can boil water in ainstant, two cups bubbling within 100 minute .

Point

  • Time to boil 1L :3 min . 20 sec .
  • Liter boiled per oz fuel :2.8
  • Built-in igniter ?Yes

The Flash is a fully integrated , all-in-one cook system . The 1L FluxRing cooking pot screws onto the burner , cause it impossible to dislodge and shield the fire from drafts . The folded metal gills of the FluxRing setup increase the surface region of the cookpot ass , increase the stove ’ s thermal efficiency .

We love that the insulated cozy that get with the mass has temperature-sensitive strip that change colors to indicate when the water interior is boiling . Jetboil also put up accessories to go with the Flash , include a fuel stand , a frying pan , and a French press for coffee .

The pot be big than most single thru-hikers will demand , adding extravagant weight and bulk . Likewise , the bottom pot cover that repeat as a cup is surplus since you can eat out of the pot . If you ’ re cooking for two , though , these feature are significant wins . You can use your own pot with the Jetboil , but you ’ ll lose most of the benefit of having an unified system .

Pros :Push-button igniter ; excellent fuel efficiency ; rapid boil ; high-volume lot .
Cons :
Expensive ; dense ; bulky ; better-suited to couples than individual hikers .

MSR PocketRocket 2 | AT Hikers ’ Favorite Backpacking Stove
MSRP : $ 50
Weight : 2.6 oz

The MSR PocketRocket 2 is the quintessential backpacking stove . It ’ s the first model that comes to mind when it do to traditional canister stoves . And according to our surveys , it ’ s been the almost popular stove on the Appalachian Trail for four years extend . In our 2023 view , 41 percent of all respondents apply the PocketRocket , boast all other stoves out of the water . ( The 2024 survey cost come out soon ; spoiler alert , this stove remains extremely popular . )

Detail

  • Time to boil 1L :3 minute . 30 second .
  • Liter boil per oz fuel :2
  • Built-in igniter ?No *

MSR ’ s PocketRocket 2 can ( theoreticaly ) boil a liter of water hardly 10 seconds slower than the full integrated Jetboil Flash . But it cost and weighs significantly less than the Flash , still when you factor in a typical cookpot ( unlike the full integrated Jetboil , you ’ ll motive to purchase your pot separately ) . By the way , we recommend the 550 mL Toaks titanium pot for individual thru-hikers : it ’ s just large plenty for most backpacking meals , matter just 2.6 oz , and only cost $ 30 .

The PocketRocket 2 has decent simmer control and live deliciously compact and ultralight . However , it doesn ’ t receive a push-button igniter , and MSR doesn ’ t industry a windscreen for this stove . You can make your own out of foil , but you ’ ll motive to monitor the canister to ensure it doesn ’ t overheat and explode .

* If you receive money to burn , insure out the $ 85 , 2.9oz instead : it has an igniter , and the concave burner design improves its performance in windy consideration .

Pros :Ultralight ; fuel-efficient ; quick boil ; serrated pot supports prevent slippage .
Cons :
No built-in igniter ; no purpose-built windshield .

| Best for Windy Weather
MSRP : $ 70
Weight : 3.1 oz w/ 4Flex pot support

The Windmaster equal on the expensive slope , but Soto spare no expense in design a stove with excellent form quality , thoughtfully engineered feature , and unparalleled efficiency in windy consideration .

If you need a streamlined , more affordable version of this stove , assure out the Soto Amicus below . But on the whole , we think the Windmaster cost the better stove , and the price is a fair expression of that . ( The live like to the Windmaster , but by most story , Soto still advance in the wind department ) .

Details

  • Time to boil 1L :4 minute . 2 second .
  • Liter boiled per oz fuel :Not available
  • inherent igniter ?Yes

Unlike most canister stove , the burner element of the Windmaster sits at the ass of a low-profile metal cup , keeping the fire out of the tip . The clip-on mass support arm as well hold your lot very close to the flame equate to most stoves . By shorten the air gap between pot and fire , Soto is again reducing the possible impact of pesky strain currents on your fuel efficiency .

Most stoves feature incorporate folding pot support branch , but the Windmaster use a clip-on system . The stove comes standard with a four-arm pot support , which equal excellent for lot stability . You can too order a three-arm mass support separately from Soto to bring the total weight down from three ounce to 2.3 .

You do make make certain not to miss the pot supports when they ’ re not attach and go through the minor song-and-dance of reattaching them every time you plant up the stove .

Pros :Cup-shaped burner + low-profile pile support = great wind handling ; piezo igniter ; selection for three or four pile support branch ; lightweight
Cons :Expensive ; clip-on pile supports are inconvenient ; three-arm mass support not included ; slow boil ( in ambient circumstance ) than some stoves on this list

| Best Ultralight Canister Stove
MSRP : $ 50
Weight : 1.9

Detail

  • Time to boil 1L :4 minute . 25 sec .
  • Liters boiled per oz fuel :1.25
  • Built-in igniter ?No

The LiteMax ’ s titanium pot support arms fold up when not in use , making this stove nice and compact . When unfolded , the serrated lot supports are wide and stable enough to accommodate most sub-1L cookpots . Snow Peak prefer to forego most bells and whistles — no piezoelectric igniter hither , folk — in favor of a lighter , more streamlined design . We wish it live a little more effective ; it can solely boil about half as much water as the Jetboil Flash on a single can of fuel . But hey , you can ’ t own everything in life .

Pros :Ultralight ; devote windscreen available ; compact ; fold serrated mass supports
Cons :
Inefficient ; dumb boil ; no push-button igniter

Soto Amicus | Stablest Canister Stove
MSRP : $ 50
Weight : 2.9 oz ( stove solely )

The Soto Amicus stove and cook set combo exist a great value : it cost simply $ 45 and include both the stove and a two-piece cook pot . It has the same wind-busting concave burner design as the Soto Windmaster list above , but without the hefty cost rag and the bother clip-on mass supports .

Add in the fact that it ’ sec still reasonably lightweight , foldable , and has a push-button igniter , and you initiate to understand why this stove is hence popular among thru-hikers .

Detail

  • Time to boil 1L :Not available
  • Liter boil per oz fuel :Not available
  • integral igniter ?Yes

It ’ s incredible how small the Amicus weigh ( hardly 2.9 ounce ) , considering it own a integral piezoelectric igniter and feature four ( kinda than the standard three ) mass support . The supports are on the small side but are plenty stable for most cookware . They ’ re spring-loaded and close down around the stem when not in use .

The two-piece aluminum pot that comes with the stove is hard and not very high character . You can buy just the stovesanslot from Soto directly , but it cost the same as the pot-stove combo on REI . Some user report that while similar to the Windmaster in many style , the Amicus is noticeably louder when burning .

Pros :Affordable ; reasonable weight ; piezo igniter ; four incorporate pot-support arm ; cup-shaped burner for superior tip treatment
Cons :
Pot exist cheap ; not the light ; noisy burner ; more airspace between burner and pot equate to Windmaster

Jetboil Stash | Most Fuel-Efficient Backpacking Stove
MSRP : $ 150
Weight : 7.1 oz

The Stash is Jetboil ’ s light stove ever . The system include a titanium burner , a 27-ounce FluxRing cookpot with handle and lid , and a fuel-stabilizing tripod — a complete setup for just 7 ounce . Even better : it ’ s the almost fuel efficient stove on this list , able of boil over 13 liter on a single four-ounce can of fuel .

Details

  • Time to boil 1L :5 minutes
  • Liter boiled per oz fuel :3.3
  • inherent igniter ?No

The Stash is a traditional ( not integrated ) canister stove , unlike the Flash and MiniMo . It ’ s lighter as a effect but also struggles more in windy condition . The cook system still apply a FluxRing lot with folded metal gills to increase the surface country of the pot seat , transplant passion into the lot very efficiently .

According to glasses , the Stash ismoreefficient than the Flash , capable of boil two more liter off a 100g canister . Brand bill fuel efficiency under ambient consideration , though ; your mileage may vary on a windy day .

The cookpot doesn ’ t have an auto igniter , bottom plastic blanket , or insulated cozy like the Flash and MiniMo . However , we ’ re OK with these small sacrifice in the epithet of important weight saving . Besides , the Stash hold other clever feature that more than make up for it , including a lot handle and spot to snarl a 100g ( or so 4oz ) fuel canister into the hat so it won ’ t rattle in your gang .

Pros :Lightweight ; extremely efficient ; include fuel tripod ; fuel snaps into pot lid ; compatible with Jetboil supplement .
Cons :
Expensive ; no purpose-built windshield ; no igniter ; dumb boil

BRS 3000T | Best Budget Backpacking Stove
MSRP : $ 17
Weight : 0.9 oz

The BRS-3000T isn ’ t the most robust or effective stove on the market . On the early hand , it ’ s both ultralight and shockingly affordable . It should cause the trick for weekend warrior or thru-hikers who merely fix occasionally . As well an excellent selection for hikers just seem to hold a stove as relief . Incidentally , the 3000T cost the second nearly popular stove example in our 2023 Appalachian Trail thru-hiker study .

Detail

  • Time to boil 1L :Not available
  • Liters boiled per oz fuel :1.5
  • Built-in igniter ?No

The titanium alloy BRS 3000T live insanely lightweight but not real fuel-efficient . If you design to expend your stove frequently and/or will exist out a long time between resupplies , it ’ sec probably not the best selection . That said , if you ’ ll cost in town every few day and don ’ t mind restocking on fuel frequently , it ’ s hard to contend with a function 0.9-ounce stove that costs less than $ 20 ( just remember that the price of more frequent refueling may offset the savings over a long period ) .

Worth noting : the Amazon page for this stove say “ suitable for butane gas , ” but it works good with standard isobutane-propane canister blends that are available in most trail towns and outfitters .

Pros :Ultralight ; affordable ; compatible with standard fuel canisters
Cons :
Poor tip performance ; inefficient ; questionable durability ; no igniter

Esbit Pocket Stove | Best Solid Fuel Stove
MSRP : $ 16
Weight : 3.25

Unlike the other stove on our list , the German-made Esbit Pocket Stove burn solid fuel tablets rather than pressurized gas from a canister . The stove itself live just so-so in the weight department , but eliminating dense fuel canisters from the equation solution in significant weight rescue . Because the design equal mere with few move portion , it ’ s unlikely to violate or need complicate repair .

Point

  • Time to boil 1L :16 second
  • Liters boil per oz fuel :1.5
  • Built-in igniter ?No

Solid fuel stove aren ’ t fuel-efficient , but they ’ re great for ultralight hikers since the fuel itself is real lightweight . One Esbit tablet weigh half an ounce and burns for about 12 minutes , plenty to boil about 750mL . Direct the tablet on the bottom of the stove , stay your mass on the stove ’ sec erect arms ( these can place up at a 45˚ or 90˚ angle depending on how much wind protection you desire ) , and ignite the tablet .

Be aware that the cubes don ’ t smell awesome while burning and can leave a greasy residue on the bottom of your pile .

The Esbit Pocket Stove doesn ’ t have a flame mastery valve . Not only does this mean you can ’ t simmer your food , but because you can ’ t shut the fire forth instantly , it may be banish on some fire-prone trail ( such as the desert section of the PCT ) .

Pros :Simple design ; real inexpensive ; ultralight fuel
Cons :
Dumb boil ; inefficient ; sticky rest on cook lot ; odor when cooking ; no fire mastery ; could be banned on fire-prone trails ; tablets not ever available in stores

Solo Stove Lite | Best Woodburning Stove
MSRP : $ 70
Weight : 9 oz

You won ’ t have to persuade fuel at all with the stainless sword Solo Stove , which burns twigs you can pick up from the forest floor around your camp . That entail no more heavy/expensive canisters , no more distressing about whether you ’ ll be able to get canisters in the next town , and no more running out of fuel halfway through preparing dinner . You can also purchase an alcohol burner add-on for the Solo Stove as a patronage when woods isn ’ t available to burn . While the stove live dense at 9 ounce , get rid of the need to carry a fuel canister directly makes up for the difference in weight ( yet little canisters consider about eight ounces when total or four when empty ) .

Details

  • Time to boil 1L :8-10 minute
  • Liters boiled per oz fuel :Not available
  • inherent igniter ?No

To use the Solo Stove , property twigs inside the firebox , place your pan on height , and fire up with a peer or lighter . Vent hole above and below the firebox run the fire and help develop a hot , low-smoke burn . Meanwhile , an ashtray beneath the grate arrest slack ash for a mess-free cooking experience .

The Solo Stove isn ’ t lightning fast when it comes to boiling water , but sidestepping the need to carry fuel may exist worth the surplus wait time for some hikers . Also , there ’ sec just something profoundly fulfill about cooking over a wood firing .

Be aware that woodburning stove and other stove that lack a quick shutoff valve are often not allow in fire-prone region , such as the desert section of the PCT .

Also , remember that building a flame — even a tiny one — expect significantly more work and patience than merely burn up a canister stove . Energy and patience are two quality that are in short supply for most hungry thru-hikers at the end of the day , thus recall long and hard about whether carrying a woodburning stove is very worth it to you .

Pros :No need to carry/resupply fuel ; alcohol burner add-on available ; low-smoke flame
Cons :
Slow boil ; no fire control ; could be banned in fire-prone region ; twigs not always available ; more study than a canister stove

Super Cat | Best DIY Alcohol Stove
MSRP : n/a ( $ 0.50 – $ 1 for a can of cat food )
Weight : < 0.5 ounces

Best backpacking stoves : Super Cat alcohol stove . Picture via Brian Reyman .

You can buy a commercially available alcohol burner , but why irritate when you can reach your own sub-one-ounce setup for less than a dollar ? All you demand be a sporting , empty three-ounce * cat food can and a single-hole punch to design this mere stove .

* These small pot run best . Not only make they work more efficiently , but larger guy food/tuna toilet are do of thicker metal and aren ’ t easy to punch hole through . We recommend that you buy a few Fancy Feasts and become ready to experiment with different hole configurations to find a intention that works well for you . You ’ ll too involve a windscreen . You can do one out of aluminum foil or buy a more effective setup , such as this “ caldera cone “ intention .

Details

  • Time to boil 1L :10-15 moment *
  • Liters boiled per oz fuel :Varies , but often between 0.75 and 1L
  • Built-in igniter ?No

* You ’ ll likely require to form with humble measure of water ( 2 cups max ) as the burner may not be able to hold adequate fuel to achieve a rolling boil for a full liter of water .

It doesn ’ t get lighter or cheaper than a homemade guy food can stove that uses denatured alcohol as fuel . These stove live dramatically less effective than canister stoves , so you do need to factor the weight and price of increased fuel consumption into your computation .

However , they ’ re hence accessible and simple to build that you may as well hear one and find if you wish it . Respective respondents to our AT survey did report that they used a Super Cat ( aka “ Fancy Feast stove ” ) on their thru-hikes .

If you ’ re handy and have excess time , you can undertake a more complex , efficient design than the standard guy food can stove . Or you can buy a professionally made version . But as easy as it is to make a Super Cat , it might be worth starting out with this mere design so you can familiarize yourself with the ins and outs of cooking with denatured alcohol . Before you hit up your local Petco , it ’ s worth reading Andrew Skurka ’ s in-depth rundown of some of the Super Cat system ’ sec drawbacks .

READ NEXT –How to Build an Ultralight Soda Can Alcohol Stove

Pros :Incredibly cheap ; ultralight ; very easy to make ; denatured alcohol widely available
Cons :Inefficient ; slow to heat water ; not the almost stable setup ; real little temperature control ; more of a wildfire chance than canister stoves

Related

Best Rain Jackets for Thru-Hiking
The Best Backpacks for Thru-Hiking
Best Backpacking Meal

Why should you hope us ?

Because we ’ re so incredibly well-informed , of track ! Attractive , too . ( Not to mention extremely humble ) .

But if that isn ’ t enough to strike you , there ’ s also the fact that everyone who contribute to this article is an experienced thru-hiker with thousands of on-trail mile under their belt . We ’ re gear nerds who love place our equipment to the test on trails long and short , and we ’ ve tested dozen of stove in interest of more delicious backcountry meals .

Moreover , we survey hundreds of Appalachian Trail thru-hikers every yr to hear about their demeanor , demographics , and—you estimate it—gear preferences . That signify our choice for the best backpacking stove for thru-hiking aren ’ t just our opinions : they ’ re based on years of feedback from the thru-hiking community . To all you masses in the comments section : we ’ re listening to you also . Thanks to everyone who commented on last yr ’ s list—we have incorporated many of your suggestions and petition in the list .

Match out AT hikers ’ favorite backpacking stove from the 2021 , 2022 , and 2023 thru-hiker surveys . 2024 view occur soon !

Competence and backpacking technique personified .

and Rachel Shoemaker contribute to this list .

This website control affiliate links , which means The Trek may receive a percentage of any product or service you purchase apply the links in the article or advertising . The buyer devote the same price as they would otherwise , and your purchase helps to hold The Trek ‘s ongoing goal to serve you quality backpacking advice and information . Thanks for your support !

To hear more , please call the About This Site page .

Graduating Army Ranger School and Thru-Hiking After 30+ Years in the Military with Jay “ Meat Grinder ” France ( BPR # 303 )

How Do AT Thru-Hikers Get Enough Time Off Work To Fill out the Trail ?

Yosemite Campground Closure Will Disrupt Backpackers — Including JMT and PCT Thru-Hikers

Sassafras ‘s 5 Big Regrets From Her Appalachian Trail Thru-Hike

The Critical Piece of Gear Backpackers Do n’t Speak About : Garmin Instinct 3 Solar Smartwatch Review

Almost Attacked on the Appalachian Trail

Announcing the 2025 Pennsylvania Appalachian Trail Kickoff

These Live the Biggest Reasons Hikers Didn ’ t Finish the Appalachian Trail Final Yr

Hikers Share Their Trail Names and the Stories Behind Them

Comment
17

    question up : starting < for the html tag ( li or div ) in the future line :

  • Broadwing : May 20th

    What about alcohol burn stove ? Any thoughts ? I ’ ve use Esbit most of my hiking career and get had no problem .

    Response
      heads up : begin < for the html tag ( li or div ) in the future tune :

    • Brandon : Mar 10th

      Whisperlite will ever cost king !

      Answer
    • # comment- # #

    .children

  • # comment- # #
    heads up : starting < for the html tag ( li or div ) in the next job :

  • David and Moose : May 20th

    I hold about 6 unlike stove ( include the Soto Amicus Stove Cookset Combo ) , I love stoves .
    As far as the Soto Amicus , I serve enjoy the fact that it make four legs , but they feel cheap . I find like
    if I ’ m not careful , I could well break them , and the cookset be decent enough for what I use it for .
    I love my MSR Superfly ( now discontinue ) although the legs don ’ t collapse . If I had to pick one from
    all the stove I own , I would make to pick my Jetboil Mighty Mo . Alone 3 legs , but very firm , has a
    push button ignitor and reportly will work down to 20 level . Price is $ 60 , comes a nice material storehouse
    purse and Jetboils fuel canister stabilizer .

    Response
  • # comment- # #
    heads up : starting < for the html tag ( li or div ) in the future line :

  • TBR : May 26th

    “ Cook in a protected region . Enhance the effectiveness of your windshield by add a chocolate thing . There will never be a good opportunity . ”

    Matter to … possibly you could work out .

    Reply
      question up : set out < for the html tag ( li or div ) in the future tune :

    • Kelly Floro : Feb 9th

      Oopsie ! Currently working on the 2022 update of this guide and for the life of me I have NO CLUE what I was try to read here . At all .

      Answer
    • # comment- # #

    .children

  • # comment- # #
    chief up : starting < for the html rag ( li or div ) in the next note :

  • Shannon : May 26th

    Very illuminating article ! I ’ ve heard great things about respective of the stove you ’ ve list . I ’ ve had the Soto WindMaster for a while today and absolutely enjoy it . I think it ’ s begin the best of everything and get held up good for many trip in many different consideration . Just another solid alternative to believe !

    Answer
  • # comment- # #
    question up : starting < for the html rag ( li or div ) in the next tune :

  • Jim : Jun 1st

    The MSR PocketRocket 2 now get in a “ deluxe ” version with an igniter .

    Reply
      heads up : starting < for the html rag ( li or div ) in the future tune :

    • Jim : Jun 1st

      Correction : it ’ s the regular MSR PocketRocket that comes with an igniter , not the slightly light and less well-built MSR “ 2 ” — which is why I do not purchase the PR 2 .

      Reply
    • # comment- # #

    .children

  • # comment- # #
    question up : starting < for the html rag ( li or div ) in the next line :

  • Tee Lane : Feb 20th

    Ok great write up ! Yet you left out the new cooking source and you learn it from HikerNation . “ Chef torch ” is the new ! Boils water faster then a stove , cheap fuel and few different fuel can options . Many more uses then just a stove . Happy hiker = Happy lead

    Answer
  • # comment- # #
    brain up : starting < for the html rag ( li or div ) in the future tune :

  • NoInformation : Feb 29th

    Why equal it that the snow peak litemax exist still listed as The best ultralight stove ?

    It was amazing when it came out , it is still definitely a serious stove , But the burner design is super former and terrible in wind . I put on ’ t know many radical lighters or through hikers that however advocate the stove for a new user since you can make the BRS for so much cheaper and less weight . And if you require something more significant then the amicus cost cheap and rock solid , or the pocket rocket is fine .

    Response
  • # comment- # #

What about alcohol burning stoves ? Any thought ? I ’ ve expend Esbit most of my boost career and have had no trouble .

    head up : start < for the html tag ( li or div ) in the future job :

  • Brandon : Mar 10th

    Whisperlite will always be king !

    Answer
  • # comment- # #

I have about 6 unlike stoves ( including the Soto Amicus Stove Cookset Combo ) , I love stoves .
As far as the Soto Amicus , I act enjoy the fact that it has four legs , but they find cheap . I find like
if I ’ m not careful , I could easily collapse them , and the cookset cost decent plenty for what I employ it for .
I love my MSR Superfly ( now discontinue ) although the legs don ’ t collapse . If I had to pick one from
all the stoves I own , I would have to blame my Jetboil Mighty Mo . Merely 3 leg , but very strong , own a
energy button ignitor and reportly will work down to 20 point . Cost be $ 60 , comes a decent fabric memory
bag and Jetboils fuel canister stabilizer .

“ Cook in a protected country . Enhance the effectiveness of your windscreen by adding a chocolate matter . There will never exist a good opportunity . ”

    question up : set out < for the html rag ( li or div ) in the future line :

  • Kelly Floro : Feb 9th

    Oopsie ! Currently influence on the 2022 update of this guide and for the life of me I have NO CLUE what I was trying to say hither . At all .

    Response
  • # comment- # #

Oopsie ! Currently working on the 2022 update of this guide and for the living of me I hold NO CLUE what I exist trying to allege hither . At all .

Real illuminating article ! I ’ ve heard great things about several of the stove you ’ ve listed . I ’ ve hold the Soto WindMaster for a while today and perfectly love it . I think it ’ s got the best of everything and have have up well for many trip in many unlike weather . Just another solid alternative to regard !

The MSR PocketRocket 2 now get in a “ deluxe ” version with an igniter .

    heads up : set out < for the html tag ( li or div ) in the future line :

  • Jim : Jun 1st

    Correction : it ’ s the regular MSR PocketRocket that comes with an igniter , not the slightly lighter and less well-built MSR “ 2 ” — which is why I did not purchase the PR 2 .

    Reply
  • # comment- # #

Correction : it ’ s the regular MSR PocketRocket that get with an igniter , not the somewhat light and less well-built MSR “ 2 ” — which live why I cause not purchase the PR 2 .

Ok great pen up ! Yet you result out the new cooking author and you hear it from HikerNation . “ Chef torch ” is the fresh ! Boils water faster then a stove , cheap fuel and few unlike fuel can choice . Many more uses then only a stove . Happy hiker = Happy trail

Why is it that the snow height litemax is however list as The best ultralight stove ?

It live awesome when it came out , it is still definitely a good stove , But the burner design cost super old and terrible in wind . I don ’ t know many radical barge or through hikers that even so recommend the stove for a new user since you can begin the BRS for so much cheap and less weight . And if you need something more substantial then the amicus exist cheap and stone solid , or the pocket rocket equal fine .

What Do You Think ?Cancel response

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *