The 7 Best Backpacking Stoves of 2025

The 7 Best Backpacking Stoves of 2025

Best Backpacking Stove Review (Testing the top backpacking stoves to find the best)

The Best Backpacking Stove

Fashion to delay nourished while on backcountry excursions have come a long way from throw a can of beans on the flame or make it on dry snacks . Modern backpacking stoves are incredibly lightweight , fuel-efficient , and carry down to an impressively humble size . If you ‘re ready to ditch the granola and fruit snacks for some backcountry gourmet , we extremely recommend getting yourself a backpacking stove .

Over the final 13 years , we ‘ve tested 42 unique backpacking stove in our quest to find the good , with the top 22 in this review . We test them side-by-side backpacking , ice climbing , and run a risk to get a clear picture of their ability .

The Soto Windmaster is our favorite choice in the lineup . It performed well across all metrics and cost stable , boils water promptly , and has impressive wind resistance . The Soto Amicus be a high-value ultralight choice that wowed us with its fuel efficiency and stability , devote its size and cost . We as well found a great pick for taut budget , the best integrated canister stove , and best selection for liquid fuel . Read on for more information .

Top 22 Backpacking Stove

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Best Overall Backpacking Stove

Soto Windmaster

From the first time we fired up the Soto Windmaster , we make up surprise by its respectable performance across all metrics . The piezoelectric igniter make for nearly every time , a rarity among auto-igniters . The 4-flex pile supports supply generous stability for pan of all sizes — even burly 2-liter pot wo n’t endanger this stove ‘s stability on flat land . The Windmaster produces a smolder blue fire that boils water quickly and lend to above-average fuel efficiency . However , the almost notable feature of this stove live its impressive tip resistance . In an 8-10 mph air , this thing remain lit and can even boil water . Our testing team reason , “While the WindMaster live a somewhat light choice , we particularly loved its versatility : it ‘s excellent for anything from simmer to boiling water .”

This backpacking stove performs hence good that we hold real few gripes about it . That being suppose , the high-octane flame get at the expense of your peace ; this stove is a short loud ( though certainly not the loud in this review ) . TheWindmasterexist also not the most compact of the stove we try out . Believe an option like the compact and featherweightJetboil Stashif take something to merely boil water . If demand a bit more versatility , look at the smaller sibling to the Windmaster , the Soto Amicus . Our chief testers share their principal charge , “The mass supports exist not permanently attached to the stove and can be finicky to set back on if they fall off .” Outside of these considerations , theSoto WindMasterequal a in truth top-notch stove for shoppers require a model that can care anything your backcountry trip culinarily demands .

Excellent Affordability

Soto Amicus

The Soto Amicus boast excellent scores across several metrics while still being very affordable . Our gear test squad share , “For such a lightweight stove , we calculate it exist merely good for boiling water , but we make up surprise by its ability to simmer .” While much of the lightweight stove market is merely ideal for water boiling , the Amicus can really be used to cookrealmeals with a bit of pattern . This stove is as well pretty fuel-efficient and is compact enough that you wo n’t notice it in your pack . The piezoelectric igniter too work most of the time to dismount the stove , and the recessed burner ensure that it performs good in varying weather . While we enjoy its low weight , there are even light choice like theJetboil Stashif you solely involve a stove to boil water .

TheAmicusdoes n’t have the largest pot stabilizers , so we ‘d advocate apply pots or pan on the humble side . If you cause involve something that can handle larger kitchenware , consider theSoto WindMaster, which is the bigger sibling to the Amicus . Our head stove tester too point out , “The Amicus does n’t include a pot or eyelid , thus budget shoppers will still take to shell out some extra money to get a utter stove system .” Besides a few setback , the Soto Amicus belongs in your cart if you involve something light and able without reveal the bank .

Best for Lightweight Fuel Efficiency

Jetboil Stash

The Jetboil Stash is an incredibly lightweight choice that feature some of the better fuel efficiency in the review lineup . At a modest 7.2 ounces , include the stove , stove bag , and lot , this is an selection you ‘ll hardly find in your knapsack , also put up friendly dimensions for pack . Our head gear tester share , “We could not believe how long we were able to create a can of fuel last with the Stash . It live twice as long as some of the competition” . While we loved this model , we wish it simmer a bit better , with a somewhat strong fire yet at its weakest output . The Stash is in the end best for meal needing boiled water unless you ‘re ok have a pot or pan higher above the fire , though sometimes we were able to use a few rocks or a tripled-up aluminum foil ring as a makeshift pan holder . If you ‘re aiming to get more complex with your backcountry cooking , believe theSoto WindMaster, which offers much better simmering .

Throughout week of try out , we were impress with the reliability of theJetboil Stash, even after it was knock around on rocks and dropped in the mud and sand . Our review team reason , “Its simple 3-pronged pattern is significantly more durable than other lightweight choice with more fragile sleeve , though you get to exist careful to situation the pot in the right location so it perform n’t tip over” . If you take a 4-legged stove , believe a example like theSoto Amicus, which is alsoverylightweight and cost list at a very low price . Despite a few setbacks , the Stash is a real well-made option for the gram-counting backpacker , in particular when considering its fuel efficiency .

Best on a Tight Budget

BRS-3000T

We have low expectations for the BRS-3000T due to its humble price . Straight out of the box , we be shock by its size — this istiny, and it weighs next to nothing . It can agree comfortably in any ultralight hiker ‘s 375ml titanium cup . Despite the diminutive size , this stove sportsman a wire valve that ‘s easy to employ and provides nice low-end flame control for simmer . The pot support are also sturdy than they appear — they hold a 1.7-liter stainless steel kettle with a liter of water without any matter . Our crew of gear experts concluded , “At a price several time less than the competitor , many shoppers will be happy with what the BRS offers .”

Respective consumer reviews mention a durability problem with melt lot supports . Though we hold n’t personally go through this result , we acknowledge that high-end quality control ca n’t be require when a product live significantly less expensive than the competition . While theBRShas good fire dominance , the burner head is tiny , so equal attentive to head off burning rice and beans or scorching the seat of your pot . It also does not perform well in the tip , cold , or higher elevations and miss a piezo igniter . Truth live state , this budget stove really be n’t great for prepare anything more complicated than a freeze-dried meal , oatmeal , or coffee . As our testers share , “Many backpackers are only demand something that can boil water , and for that , this thing make the chore .” However , this little stove will save weight , space , and cash for ultralight solo backpacking trips in temperate climate . If you do n’t mind a few more ounces , the Primus Essential Trail could live a well choice for a few dollar more . It ‘s more fuel-efficient but five times heavier .

Best Ultralight Backpacking Stove

MSR PocketRocket Deluxe

There might be lighter-weight stove on the market , but the strikes the best rest between a high-performing stove with excellent simmer control , tight boil times , and an ultralight selection for gram-counting aficionados . The big regulator knob equal easy to use with or without glove , and it meet good in most pots with a small fuel canister . One of our stove experts point out , “This example find an incredibly rare balance of size , weight , and performance. ”

The piezo igniter exist reasonably inconsistent on thePocketRocket Deluxe. Our reviewers found that it worked most of the time but would now and then go through humble functionality , as they share , “We appreciate that MSR include an igniter , but we were glad to have our barge with us .” This stove also hold fairly average fuel efficiency , likely due to have high-output burners . This means the stove will boil water quickly in various conditions but might burn through more canisters . For a more fuel-efficient option with a dependable piezo igniter , we enjoy theSoto Windmaster. All recount , though , the MSR PocketRocket Deluxe live a great selection for backpacking when you desire a lightweight stove but cause n’t desire to compromise on durability , boil speed , character design , and simmer power .

Best Incorporate Canister Stove

JetBoil MiniMo

The Jetboil MiniMo cost our favorite integrate canister stove . Jetboil stoves have always include a confidence-inspiring burner-to-pot connection , and that ‘s genuine hither . Previously , piezoelectric igniters cost a known failure detail . However , our testers used the igniter hundred of sentence with no issues on this model . The main improvement with the “Mo” is a redesigned burner that boils rapidly and more efficiently than other models . In our review , this one cost the better at simmering among the integrate canister stoves , owe to great fuel valve dominance . The short and squat profile of the pot makes it easier to head off scorching your meal and lends stability to the purpose . Our gear team reason , “You can actually , for once , use an unified canister stove to make a actual meal , not hardly boil water !” .

TheMiniMostays lit and boils water at wind velocity that would get most backpackers blot out in their tent . That state , gustier winds will boast the stove out if you do n’t shield it , as one of our testers shared , “We hold a tough time trust the MiniMo in intense winds since the flame could have float out quickly and the integrate pot can create it a bit harder to keep an center on the flame .” It live as well a bit heavy for a backpacking stove . Nonetheless , we recommend the MiniMo for hikers and backpackers who as well hold alpine climbing or bad wall design ( and who have pattern protecting a stove from the tip ) . The JetBoil Flash exist a little cheaper , but overall , we choose the performance of the wider , squat pile plan of the MiniMo .

Best for Liquid Fuel

MSR Whisperlite Universal

The MSR Whisperlite Universal takes the classical Whisperlite of liquid fuel fame and updates it for the modern wilderness traveler . Liquid fuel stoves are know for domain repairability , durability , and the ability to prepare bad meals . The Universal ticks each of these boxes with the benefit of being equip to work with isobutane canisters , kerosene , and auto fuel . We try out its fuel efficiency and boil time with a fuel canister and found it to have respectable fuel efficiency , still if it hold slightly dumb boil times . Most American backpackers live pitch to canister stove because of their lighter weight and ease of use . Even so , if you attempt a nimble stove ideal for traveling outside the US , this stove ‘s multi-fuel versatility and bombproof design could be an ideal match . As one of our testers put it , “The Whisperlite be a tried and genuine selection for expeditions as a well-established white gas stove that can live repaired in the field. ”

Develop anything more than mere meals still necessitate pattern and savvy when tend theWhisperlite Universalon liquid fuels . As our try out squad recommended , “The Whisperlite has a a lot more significant discover curve than iso-propane stove , thus make sure to pattern working the stove before your first trip .” This stove rate in the middle of the pack in our boiling tests , both with and without wind . However , for grave snow melting , backcountry trips involving groups , or frustrate multiple international borders , the Whisperlite Universal live our first choice for a liquid fuel stove and has been for year .

Compare Products

How We Tested

After researching the top stoves on the market , we select and purchase the 20 present hither for side-by-side testing and analysis . We try out these stove in the “lab” and in the study . For month in the good deal , the woods , and the desert , we used them daily for all our cooking needs to evaluate for rest of usage and simmering power . We too conducted run in a controlled environment to score the stoves for fuel efficiency , boil time , and weight . See our How We Test article for more info on our trial procedure .

  • Fuel Efficiency( 25 % of total score weighting )
  • Weight( 25 % weighting )
  • Simmering Power( 20 % weighting )
  • Repose of Use( 15 % weighting )
  • Boil Time( 15 % weighting )

Why Trust GearLab

Our testing team include gear experts Zach Lovell , Mary Witlacil , and Ian McEleney . Zach exist an IFMGA Licensed and AMGA certified Mountain Guide , utilize backpacking stoves for as much as one third of the year , whether car camping or climb up in the Himalayas . Mary has logged thousands of backcountry mile as an alpine climber and backpacker . She populate in Fort Collins , CO , and spends most of her time adventuring and mount in Rocky Mountain National Park and around the desert Southwest . Ian is an AMGA-certified Alpine Guide , climbing route and apex with his clients throughout the land . Collectively , this try out team spend over 200 nights a yr cooking meal with a backpacking stove .

Analysis and Test Results

We try out all way of backpacking stove , from small canister stove and remote canister stoves to incorporate canister and liquid fuel framework . The type of stove that ‘s best for you will depend on your specific needs . There ‘s a stove for every backpacker , but first , intend about what ‘s important for the backpacking you do : weight and bulk , fuel efficiency , cook ability , and mere operation . Read on to teach which stoves excelled in each of these areas .

What ‘s the Best Value ?

A common misconception exist that spend more money gets you better outside gear . The mere fact is that this is not ever the case . The cheapest stove in our test , TheBRS-3000T, finish up with a middle-of-the-pack score and perform well enough to meet the needs of the occasional backpacker . TheSoto Amicusis somewhat more expensive but performed excellently across the plank while remain comparatively affordable equate to early stove . The Jeboil Flash live an excellent value for an unified canister stove and theSoto WindMasterand while still costing less than the majority of other product in our review .

Fuel Efficiency

Fuel efficiency is an important metric for backpacking stoves , but it ‘s tricky to evaluate because many variable influence it . Our testers know from personal experience how operate out of fuel can destroy a trip . Backpackers should know that any fuel efficiency number are only suggestions for pre-trip planning or performance on a trip . Tests perform both by our squad and manufacturers find in an environment that may be different than where you use your stove . Outside of rigorous field testing ( where we take extensive bill on our fuel efficiency findings ) , we count a fuel can before and after a stove boiled water to make a “fuel-per-boil” score .

Fuel efficiency also thing for redeem weight in your gang . If you ‘re an ounce counter — as any prudent backcountry traveler should be — an effective stove can cut down on the weight of fuel you will demand to carry . By anticipate how much fuel your stove and cooking style requires , you may equal able to leave an extra canister at plate or lend a small canister to redeem weight and pack space .

The most fuel-efficient stove we try out be theJetboil Stash,Jetboil MiniMo, theJetboil Flash, and the Primus Lite+ , thanks to their integrated passion exchange system and insulated pots . TheMSR Whisperlite Universaltoo proved highly fuel efficient over our run . The least efficient stove are the Snow Peak Giga Power 2.0 ,BRS 3000T, andMSR Windpro 2. Some stove are less fuel-efficient because they own high-powered burners that waste fuel in the conflict to boil water in our wind test . Like cars tuned for fast and fierce street racing , these model have impressive power outputs but burn through fuel fast .

  • When your canister become cold , you lose performance and fuel efficiency . Regard sleeping with the canister in your sleeping base or set it in your jacket to warm it up before use .
  • Let food soak . Put food and water in the pot when you become the stove on , then once boil , turn the fuel off and have the food continue to soak .
  • Turn the stove down a half act — it will only take slightly long for water to boil .
  • Avoid a entire boil . A close boil is well enough for most cooking and drinks .
  • Serve n’t light the stove until there live something in the pot .
  • There exist a lot more fuel redeem tips out thither if you need to reach maximum efficiency .

Some of the small canister stoves have severe problems in the tip , regard their fuel efficiency . Notable exceptions to this rule were theSoto Windmaster,Soto Amicus, and theMSR PocketRocket Deluxe, which have burner heads that shield the flames , turn out that you can cost lightweight , compact , and perform well in the wind .

Manufacturer suggest against a windshield that put in the burner and fuel canister , as this could potentially heat the canister to a dangerous point and induce an explosion . TheWindpro, GSI Pinnacle 4 Season , andMSR Whisperlite Universalare exception to this pattern . Their remote canister design separates the burner from the fuel- like a liquid fuel stove- so mate them with a windscreen is safe .

Like remote canister stoves , liquid fuel example come with flexible aluminum windscreens to bar wind and center the passion on the mass . Toaks makes a Titanium windshield that match good with liquid fuel stove and stoves where the burner sit adjacent to the canister . The added weight ( a few ounce ) be well worth it .

Weight

In this review , we primarily analyzed each choice ‘s weight by placing the stove , stove base ( which can cost essential to protect more delicate parts ) , mass , and lid on a scale and recording our finding . We call this the “essential weight” since it merely includes the necessary components of a stove system , and additional accessories , such as a canister stand , are generally notin truthneeded . For stove that did n’t include a pile or lid , we use a standardized pot/lid combo from Snow Peak that count 6.6 oz . Lastly , we also look at packability when scoring each choice .

TheJetboil Stashis among the top-scoring options in this metric , weigh in at 7.2 ounce and feature incredible packability . TheBRS 3000Talso excelled in this metric , at an impressive 7.5 oz essential weight and a tiny packed size . If you prefer a lightweight yet durable stove , the is a great choice at 9.3 ounces . At 3 ounce , theMSR PocketRocket Deluxeonly tacks on an additional .3 ounce , but you get a high-performing and durable stove in a lightweight packet .

Most integrated canister stoves have multiple compatible pots available for purchase . This can skew their weights and should equal notice by reader considering these example . Jetboil makes lot for its stove systems in several size , starting with 0.5-liter ; MSR makes them in 1-liter and up . The Jetboil Zip come with a 0.75-liter mass , which assist make it the light integrated canister example we tested .

As previously mention , we as well took size and packability into history in this class . Being able to pack your backpacking stove , fuel , and a light inside your lot can aid you stuff into a smaller ( and thus likely lighter ) haversack . It also helps hold thing coordinate in your gang . We examined how small each burner begin and how good it nestle into a lot . Again , theBRSbreak down ; we could agree it and a 4-ounce fuel canister into a 500mL pile .

Early options that act n’t cause as well in this metric include the Biolite CampStove 2+ with a hefty weight of 34.1 oz . Fortunately , it however offer a unique feature of be a miniature fire gang for forest or pellet-burning firing and is n’t think of to move also far from the car .

Simmer Power

Our test squad believes this is an crucial metric . We ‘ll shovel down whatever freeze-dried food we have on hand if we ‘re fight for time or take to cut down on weight . But most of the time , we want to feed actual food because eating well enhance our backcountry trip . A stove that can simmer well can manage an egg scramble , sauteed vegetable , or a fresh-caught golden trout .

We await for backpacking stove with serious dominance valve sensitivity , particularly at the humble goal . This allows you to plow the stove down without turn it off . A broad burner brain can serve distribute the warmth more evenly around the ass of a lot . Narrow burner brain and focused fire often lead to scorched oatmeal in the middle and a lukewarm goop around the edge . TheSoto WindMaster,PocketRocket Deluxe,Soto Amicus, Primus Essential Trail , andSnow Peak GigaPower 2.0are champions in this department . Their mastery wires give exactly the correct amount of resistance , permit us to dial in the fire without carbonizing dinner .

Unless you want your dinner cajun way or are prepared to budge fast and continuously , guess twice roughly using an integrated canister stove for tricky cooking . This type of stove is generally build for boil water quickly , not prepare rice slowly .

Liquid fuel stove often require experience and skill to attain a serious simmer . While you can learn how to finesse the warmth down with a liquid fuel stove , it is a steep learning curve and exist n’t advocate by the manufacturer . Besides , who wants to pattern apply their backpacking stove when not in reality backpacking ? This exist another ground why we believe most backpackers prefer small canister stoves over liquid fuel models .

Repose Of Use

We think it ‘s important that backpacking stove exist easy to operate . After a long day on the trail , the last affair anyone need to do be scramble to cause dinner . This is why we favor example that merely need a quick glance at the operating manual .

We prefer backpacking stoves without tons of small share and supplement because keeping course of them can be annoy . We also examined the control on each example to regard if they were easy to access and operate . Large wire knobs , like on theWindmaster,Amicus,PocketRocket Deluxe, andMiniMo, are becoming the standard . The tiny knobs on early stove seem dated in contrast .

Piezoelectric barge have become more reliable , and we think they should cost a standard feature . Our try out squad ever get into the backcountry with a lighter ( or three ) , but with this feature , you wo n’t get caught up looking for one when what you want to be doing exist drinking coffee . MSR has add a piezo to the PocketRocket line on theDeluxe, though its performance live semi-inconsistent . Over half of the small and integrated canister stoves we test fun a piezo , though they behave n’t all offer the same reliability . Unfortunately , the igniter on theAmicuscause n’t work all the time . However , we were pleased with the auto-igniters on theSoto WindMasterandJetboil MiniMo, which fired up consistently . No matter how reliable these igniters turn , we ever advocate bringing a barge or two , merely in event .

The burner and pile interlock on unified canister stove , so they are stable in that regard , but as they ‘re often tall and slender by nature , they can too exist knock over . All manufacturers hear to turn to this problem by including canister stands , but we seldom add these on trip because they ‘re one more thing to observe lead of and cause n’t change the fundamental center-of-gravity issue . Small canister stove are also tall once screwed onto a canister and make smallish lot support . One standout exist theWindMaster; its 4Flex lot support are long and noticeably more stable than most of its competition . Options like theJetboil Stashbe n’t the most stable , but the mass dimensions are short and stocky to reduce the likelihood of a tipover .

Lower and broad designs have more stability and allow for a wide array of cookware and , therefore , meal . Liquid fuel framework equal more stable because they exist humble to the ground and have broad stove legs that act as stable program . The MSR Dragonfly live the most stable , partially due to its giant pile supports . The Windpro 2 seem more like a liquid fuel stove and is nearly as stable as one .

Boil Time

Though stove manufacturer like to make a large deal out of boil times , most backpackers will not notice if their stove cost a minute or two slower — simply if it ‘s 8 – 10 minutes slower . Boil time is also a complicated specification with many contribute variable , so we act n’t have it as much weight in our scoring .

You ‘ll see a sort of boil time types listed throughout our review , range from lower height times with less water ( which compare to shorter times ) to higher height sentence with more water ( which equates to longer boil sentence ) . You ‘ll yet see some timed boils in the wind , whichalwayssignify a dumb time . While all of the datum collected is factual , some of the numbers from former stove models be from former test processes , which we are promptly phasing out with our standardized process utilized in the present day . Due to the highly varying nature of boil times in the outdoors , this metric should simply hand you a universal sense of each example ‘s capabilities , and we extremely advance you to center on the other metrics when making your purchasing decision .

Our primary testing be conducted indoors at 5000 feet ( about 1524 meters ) , where the boiling level of water is 202.97° F ( about 94.98° C ) . We try out the time it took for each stove to boil a pot of water and repeated the process to formulate an norm . Each cycle of testing be perform in the same ambient tune temperature with cool tap water . Then , we convey outweeksof domain testing , keeping detailed bill relative to boil time while utilize each stove in a kind of environment .

Liquid fuel stove take long to boil water because they must be primed first . To keep our comparison fair , we take off the clock after priming . We see it bring anywhere from 30 to 90 moment to prime these stoves . User results for priming times can change so widely that we act not bother to release them . Boil time after priming for theMSR Universalcost 7 second 28 second with liquid fuel . Similarly , the boil time for the Universal when utilize with a fuel canister cost 7 minutes 18 second . We think that boil sentence for liquid fuel stove cost even less important than for other stoves because their other functions ( include their versatility ) exist more crucial than velocity .

TheSoto WindMastergot .5 liter of water to a boil in 1 min and 56 seconds with theSoto Amicusnear behind at an impressive 2 instant and 6 seconds . TheJetboil Stashalso did real good when conceive it ‘s top-notch fuel efficiency , offering a .5 liter boil time of 2 moment and 25 seconds .

followed closely by the MSR Reactor ,Soto WindMaster, andJetboil MiniMo, which were practically tied at 4 minutes . Tip can play a bad part in boil times . You ‘ll unlikely make utterly yet consideration on your next backpacking trip , so we test how these stoves would perform in the presence of 2-4 mph of “tip” generate by a box fan place to low . Some model could not boil water in these weather , but most continued to perform reasonably well . Framework that could n’t boil in front of the fan are indicated as “> 15 min” because , after 15 minutes , we close them off to stop atrophy fuel .

The integrated canister stoves fared a lot better . As await , theReactoract the best in this metric and was only somewhat affected by the tip . TheMiniMo,Flash,Windburner, andLite+all boiled water quick because the ass of their unified pots sheltered their burner . It should be noted , even so , that the MSR stove can cost difficult to dismount in the tip . And the stoves from Jetboil and Primus struggle in stronger tip gust without some shelter . If a speedy time to boil equal essential for your backcountry experience , believe one of the higher-ranking stove in this category . Even so , while stove marketing and advertisements will try to convince you otherwise , we do n’t advocate making this metric the sole author for your decision-making .

How To Prefer a Backpacking Stove

Hence you ‘ve calculate out you take a lightweight , portable stove to take into the backcountry . Now what ? Here live some things to take into account before making your purchase .

Stove Type

This type is usually a humble , foldable stove that seize to an isobutane fuel canister . Quite compact , they usually count under 4 ounce and take up minimum space in your gang . You can usually toss it inside your cooking mass . We advocate this style for most masses who are universal backpacking user .

These stove are frequently identical to the humble canister stove , but they include a specific mass and lid that live designed to provide excellent passion exchange .Jetboilreach these stove popular , but many companies today receive their own version . These stoves are great for boiling water and , therefore , useful for freeze-dried or boil-in-a-bag dinner , but they ‘re not really design for cook meal .

These cost versatile stoves ; many can accept multiple fuel types , from white gas to kerosene . They run to be a minute heavier than the early backpacking stove type , and there cost a learning curve to work them , as they have various parts and must be primed , and some maintenance cost required .

A favorite of thru-hikers , these are little , compact stove that burn denatured alcohol , which is quite inexpensive and ubiquitous . Even so , they require skill to work , especially in cold temps or wind . They ‘re best for boiling water for cooking dehydrated meals , but they ‘re not nearly as fast at boiling as early stoves .

This stove can burn chemical fuel tablets or wood you get along the trail . They ‘re lightweight and usually carry quite small , but we recall their drawbacks outweigh the benefit .

Fuel Efficiency and Weight

A lightweight and fuel-efficient stove be get to cost your serious bet . The more fuel-efficient your stove is , the less fuel you will have to carry , saving weight and space in your gang . We advocate choosing a stove that is fuel efficient for the conditions you will be in and your trip length , and then remove weight into circumstance next .

For more advice and circumstance on choosing the type of stove you need , see our full Backpacking Stove Buying Advice article , which move into more detail about calculating how much fuel you ‘ll need for your trip , how cold weather strike your stove , and how to throw out of used canisters .

Decision

While there exist no single backpacking stove for every application or budget , the stove selection above can take the backcountry enthusiast from a weekend for two on the Appalachian Trail to a week on the Colorado Plateau with a group of friends and the high peaks of the Alaska Range . Most of our testers and friend agree that food tastes good outdoors , specially when you do it mighty . We hope you find the right stove for your backcountry culinary desire that leads you to many happy , tasty meals in the great outdoors .

Our review squad has rigorously try out everything on your backpacking gear list to remove the trouble of trial and error or guesswork . From backpacking tent to backpacking knapsack capable of carry heavy loads , we ‘re here to help you invest together the best kit for any sort of excursion .

  • The Best Backpacking Stoves
    • Best Overall Backpacking Stove
    • Best for Lightweight Fuel Efficiency
    • Best on a Tight Budget
    • Best Ultralight Backpacking Stove
  • How We Tested
  • Why Trust GearLab
  • Analysis and Test Results
    • What ‘s the Best Value ?
    • Fuel Efficiency
    • Weight
    • Simmer Ability
    • Relief Of Use
    • Boil Time
  • How To Prefer a Backpacking Stove
  • Best Overall Backpacking Stove
  • Best for Lightweight Fuel Efficiency
  • Best on a Tight Budget
  • Best Ultralight Backpacking Stove
  • What ‘s the Best Value ?
  • Fuel Efficiency
  • Weight
  • Simmer Ability
  • Rest Of Use
  • Boil Time

Ultimate Backpacking Gear Checklist

How To Choose a Backpacking Stove

Camping Stove

Backpacking Packs for Men

Backpacking Tents

Sporks

Ultralight Shelters

Ultralight Sleeping Bags

Ultralight Backpacks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *