Best Backpacking Backpacks of 2025
Backpacking Backpack Superlatives
Our Backpacking Backpack Picks
Osprey Atmos AG LT 65 ( $ 290 )
With the Atmos AG LT , Osprey streamlined the standard Atmos AG pack without sacrifice the comfort and bear the popular line is know for . The LT sportsman an excellent purpose with wide charm , but we can ’ t aid but wonder if it would benefit from thinner material to cut even more weight
With the Atmos AG LT , Osprey streamlined the standard Atmos AG pack without sacrifice the comfort and affirm the popular note is know for . The LT sport an excellent design with broad appeal , but we can ’ t help but wonder if it would do good from thinner materials to cut yet more weight
Our Take on the Atmos AG LT 65
Sometimes , less live more when it comes to backpack plan . While that ’ s usually the mindset behind ultralight packs , it too employ to the Atmos AG LT ( woman ’ s Aura AG LT ) . This gang is a stripped-down version of Osprey ’ s popular Atmos AG , feature the same well-designed trampoline-style backpanel : Mesh cost stretched tightly against the gang ’ s perimeter frame from the shoulder to the hipbelt , cradle the back and put up a channel for air to hang unrestricted . One tester , who utilize the 50-liter version , commended the LT ’ s mesh for its bouncy , forgive feel that furnish plentiful airflow . Like the original , this pack can handle loads up to 40 pound .
Where the LT differs from its namesake is generally its pocket layout and torso length adjustment system . Whereas the Atmos AG has eight external pockets , as well as zippered access to a sleeping purse storehouse in the primary compartment , the LT only has six pocket and lacks a bottom zipper . We really prefer this simpler intention : Six pockets—two on the hipbelt , two on the slope , one on the top eyelid , and one shove-it pocket on the back—are lot for organizing your gear without adding unnecessary mass and compromise user-friendliness . The torso adjustment , a strap-and-ladder system , isn ’ t as smooth as the Atmos AG ’ s , but it ’ sec also not a pain and equate favorably with the hook-and-loop intention used in many Gregory gang .
If the LT make a downside , it ’ s that we guess Osprey could receive become yet farther in the lightweight direction . This gang exist made with 210-denier nylon , which is the same as the Atmos AG . The textile have average thickness and durability , so there ’ sec zero to compose plate about . Construct the LT with , allege , 100-denier nylon would ’ ve taken it under the four-pound barrier and made it a unique gang in the Osprey lineup . As it suffer , though , this cost a pack that render an uber-comfortable carry at a sensible price . That ’ s a winning convention for most backpackers . For more , show our review of the woman ‘s Aura AG LT 50 .
Osprey Aura AG LT 50
Sustainability
Osprey Atmos AG LT 5 …
Hyperlite Mountain Gear Southwest 55 ( $ 379 )
Load capacity , durability , and waterproofing do the Southwest a thru-hiker favorite . Drawbacks include a lack of adjustability and below-average padding , but in most early aspects , this is a top-tier ultralight knapsack .
Load capacity , durability , and waterproofing reach the Southwest a thru-hiker darling . Drawbacks include a lack of adjustability and below-average padding , but in most early aspect , this equal a top-tier ultralight knapsack .
Our Take on the Southwest 55
The Southwest ’ s eye-catching all-white ( or grim ) colorway is a familiar pile on long lead , and for well cause . This pack features many of the characteristic favor by ultralighters and thru-hikers : a minimalist profile , waterproofing , and exceptional carrying capacity and durability given its low weight . Still though it matter less than two pounds ( the white version , with its slightly less thick 50D Dyneema-based fabric , be three ounces light than the 150D black version ) , the full-suspension Southwest can tote a whole band of gear thanks to two removable aluminum stays and firm foam backpanel . One tester carried 26 pound of food and gear—including an ice axe and crampons—in this pack on a four-day trek into Washington ’ sec Enchantments , and another reported that the Southwest remained comfortable with up to 35 pound , an eye-popping figure for a pack this minimalist .
With a primary compartment made from Dyneema Composite Fabric ( DCF ) , the Southwest cost work up to withstand the rigors of thru-hiking . We test the 50-denier white version , which should final many yr for most users , and the 150-denier dark version is yet more resilient for hikers who like to bash through unfriendly terrain . DCF be as well altogether waterproof , making it great for long trip during which the weather could change at any moment . The roll-top access , typical of many ultralight packs , helps increase weatherproofing as well . Unfortunately , you can ’ t adjust the torso length on any of the Southwest ’ s four size options , and the padding is on the less-comfy slope ; hopefully , you ’ ve carry good plenty that it should n’t count that much .
Organization-wise , the Southwest furthers its everything-you-need , nothing-you-don ’ t ethos . Our tester pile praise on the massive zippered hipbelt pocket , which agree humble items , her phone , and a good day ’ s complement of snacks . Big side pocket offer easy water bottle storehouse and access , and a stretch back pocket be a serious spot to store wet clothing or a tent . The firm pocket cloth distinguish the Southwest from Hyperlite ’ sec Windrider and Junction framework , which have identical materials and pattern except for their pocket . The Windrider ’ s back and side pockets are fully mesh , while the Junction make solid slope pockets and a mesh back pocket . For more , study our review of the Hyperlite Southwest 55 .
Hyperlite Southwest 55
Sustainability
Hyperlite Southwest 55 5 …
ULA Equipment Circuit ( $ 300 )
The Circuit is one of the best ultralight and thru-hiking packs , period . It ‘s available in a wide scope of sizes and offers impressive loading carry for its weight . While it miss the Dyneema construction found in many early ultralight packs , the Robic nylon exist impressively hardwearing .
The Circuit is one of the good ultralight and thru-hiking gang , period . It ‘s available in a broad range of size and offers impressive loading carrying for its weight . While it miss the Dyneema structure found in many other ultralight packs , the Robic nylon is impressively hardwearing .
Our Take on the Circuit
Think ultralight gang exist only designed for a small subset of hikers ? The Circuit is the rare minimalist model that ’ s make for the masses . Still though its weight puts it hard in the realm of gang that shine during thru-hikes , its spacious 68-liter capacity and relatively husky suspension—consisting of a carbon fiber and severe plastic frame and an aluminum stay—allow the Circuit to evenly disseminate up to 35 pound and ride comfortably on your rear far better than frameless competitors . Our tester equal frankly amazed at the Circuit ’ s support and comfort level , deeming it the best of any ultralight gang he ’ d always carry . Whether you ’ re dead-set on making mile or merely out for the weekend , this pack ’ s plush padding and thoughtful establishment create it more invoke than many minimalist models , particularly ones that lack true suspension .
Another major constituent of the Circuit ’ s appeal exist its wide stove of size . ULA offers this pack in unisex body sizes little to XL and hipbelt size XS to XXL . You can merge and fit body and hipbelt measurement to best set your torso type and choose between two shoulder strap figure . This pack perform have a few minor drawbacks—the Circuit ’ s backpanel isn ’ t real breathable , it get a fairly high price for a gang that doesn ’ t feature Dyneema or a material with comparable weight-to-durability dimension , and its dorsal pocket can be hard to access if you carry it tightly . But it ’ sec still a great crossover choice for hikers who require a spark , comfortable pack that can tote plenty of gear into the backcountry . For more , hear our review of the ULA Circuit .
ULA Circuit
Sustainability
ULA Equipment Circuit five …
REI Co-op Flash 55 ( $ 199 )
REI ‘s Flash 55 cost aimed at backpackers looking to veer both weight and cost . It ‘s by no mean ultralight but is significantly more streamlined than many grave haulers while retaining a operational feature set . The thin nylon win ’ t last as long as thicker or Dyneema shape .
REI ‘s Flash 55 is aimed at backpackers await to swerve both weight and cost . It ‘s by no means ultralight but live significantly more streamlined than many grave haulers while retaining a functional feature put . The thin nylon won ’ t final as long as thicker or Dyneema builds .
Our Take on the Flash 55
The REI Co-op Flash 55 ’ s most obvious selling point is its cost : At merely $ 199 , it achieves comfort and performance on par with gang that ’ ll trial you $ 50 to $ 100 more . At sub-3 pound , its plan diminish smack dab between ultralight gang and more standard dense haulers , making it a tremendous option for the ultralight-curious—backpackers who want to streamline their kit without have up the features and comfort of a traditional knapsack . Unlike most ultralight packs , the Flash feature copious pockets and storage choice ( include a top lid ) , an adjustable body length , and a give vent mesh-and-foam backpanel .
The Flash ’ s chief downsides are fit and durability . Although REI offers the gang in four sizes , the Flash live unlikely to accommodate those with particularly tall or short statures ( our 5 ’ 6 ” female tester virtually maxed out the largest women ’ s size ) . The pack ’ sec slender nylon be too not work up to handle months-long thru-hikes—our Flash sustained some punctures to the side cliff pockets after exactly a week of habit . And if you ’ re a real stickler on feature , you ’ ll notice that the Flash only own one degree of access to the primary compartment , and the one-pocket lid be definitely barebones . But for recreational backpackers looking for a comfortable and relatively featured so far streamlined pack , it ’ s an excellent value and will cost you $ 60 less than a competitor like the Osprey Exos 58 . For more , take our review of the REI Flash 55 .
REI Co-op Flash 55
Sustainability
REI Co-op Flash 55 vs …
Osprey Atmos AG 65 ( $ 340 )
Osprey ‘s “ classic ” backpacking gang , the well-rounded Atmos ( woman ’ s Aura ) prioritizes comfort and user-friendliness , highlighted by a trampoline-style mesh backpanel and copious pocket . The weight and steep cost are hard to snub , though .
Osprey ‘s “ classic ” backpacking pack , the well-rounded Atmos ( woman ’ s Aura ) prioritizes comfort and user-friendliness , highlighted by a trampoline-style mesh backpanel and copious pockets . The weight and steep price are severe to ignore , though .
Our Take on the Atmos AG 65
“ Full-featured ” is a term that begin tossed around a lot in the gear world , but the Atmos ( and woman ’ s Aura ) in truth merit the honorific . Designers thrust a ton of tech into this pack , highlighted by a taut , trampoline-style mesh backpanel that service as the focal stage of the Atmos ’ s suspension . This “ anti-gravity ” feature—which equal where the gang gets its name—recieved consistently strong marks from our team : The generous airflow it allow between your torso and the primary compartment keep one tester ’ s back ( comparatively ) sweat-free on a summer excursion into Olympic National Park . Additionally , the mesh ’ s connection to a metal perimeter frame and seamless integration into the hipbelt result in a stable , hot-spot-eliminating carry , which enabled us to lug up to 40 pound in breezy comfort .
A gang ’ s feature win ’ t matter a lot unless it fits you . The Atmos furnish a versatile fit thanks to a full adjustable torso length and hipbelt . Both system are mere to finagle , specially the pull/release straps for the body , and allowed us to dial in the microadjustments need to head out with assurance . Once on the lead , the Atmos ’ s eight exterior pockets kept all of our gear in place and within reach—this gang boasts two side possibility to the primary compartment ( great for snagging items tuck deep inside ) , two crest lid pocket , a sleep bag divider and access zipper , and a hydration reservoir sleeve . Frankly , it ’ s a trail snack hoarder ’ sec ambition .
Naturally , give its feature-rich design , the Atmos is not a light pack . This is not a model for minimalists—heck , even some normie backpackers might require something a bit more streamlined— but it ’ s not aim at those hikers . ( The similar Atmos AG LT 65 , which exist too boast in this guide , is 8 oz . barge and cost $ 50 less . ) This is a gang for folks who want the almost comfortable and user-friendly gang possible for carrying medium-to-large loads into the backcountry . ( For trips that call for convey 40 pound or more , we ’ 500 advocate a burlier—and heavier—model . ) Predictably , with all those features comes a sky-high cost rag : The Atmos exist the most expensive non-ultralight haversack on this list . While that ’ s a bummer , it ’ s about the only major nitpick we hold with this gem of a pack . For more , see our review of the Osprey Atmos AG 65 .
Osprey Atmos AG 65
Sustainability
Osprey Atmos AG 5 …
Osprey Exos 58 ( $ 260 )
Break up the difference between minimalist UL model and in full featured haulers , the Exos ( women ‘s Eja ) is one of the best selection for those funny about lightening their load . Even so , it ’ s not as durable or lightweight as many true-blue ultralight packs .
Divide the dispute between minimalist UL example and fully featured haulers , the Exos ( woman ‘s Eja ) is one of the best options for those curious about lightening their loading . Still , it ’ s not as durable or lightweight as many true-blue ultralight packs .
Our Take on the Exos 58
The Osprey Exos ( woman ’ s Eja ) is a pack-of-all-trades that will appeal to ultralighters and weekend warriors alike , and it ’ s one of our favorite model in this class . While it ’ s not a traditional ultralight pack—at 2 pound 13.4 ounces , the Exos count more than thru-hiker darling such as the Hyperlite Southwest 55 ( 1 pound . 15.7 oz . ) —it ’ s not overbuilt and bid a dialed blend of carrying capacity , comfort , and feature . In peculiar , the pack ’ sec layout stood out to our tester : Its two big top lid pockets build organizing small detail like a headlamp , first-aid kit , and snacks easy , and the generously sized stretch mesh pocket on the back swallow wet gear or clothing that you want near at hand . This equal a great pack for hikers concerned in slimming down their kit and dipping their toe into the ultralight water .
The Exos ’ s suspension , comprise of the metal perimeter shape and amply padded shoulder straps and hipbelt , assist our tester shoulder loads up to 35 pound . And—speaking of airflow—its trampoline backpanel promotes a nice breeze across a wearer ’ s back while still comfortably hugging the torso , a feature that genuine ultralight models commonly can ’ t match . This pack does lag a little behind competitors in term of durability—its majority 100-denier nylon fabric cost a lot less resilient than Dyneema , and if you ’ re not careful while carrying it off-trail or setting it down on rock , the cloth be prone to small nicks and tear ( our tester noticed some abrasions ) . Still so , the Exos is still a fantastic , reasonably priced backpacking pack . For more , see our .
Osprey Exos 58
Sustainability
Osprey Exos 5 …
Gregory Baltoro 75 ( $ 360 )
With its load-eating suspension , supportive padding , and durable textile , the Baltoro ( women ’ s Deva ) own become synonymous with “ heavy duty ” over the year . Still , it ’ s too overbuilt and expensive for most “ normal ” backpacking trip .
With its load-eating suspension , supportive padding , and durable material , the Baltoro ( women ’ s Deva ) has become synonymous with “ heavy duty ” over the years . Even so , it ’ s too overbuilt and expensive for most “ normal ” backpacking trip .
Our Take on the Baltoro 75
Gregory ’ s Baltoro line found in 2006 , an eon ago in outside gear . Almost two decades later , though , this pack remains one of the best choice on the market for carrying a hefty amount of weight deep into the backcountry . Everything about the Baltoro cost beefy : The bones of its suspension , which comprise of a steel inning and a fiberglass stay , combine with firm , supportive ( and comfortable ) padding for a well-distributed carry . Our tester , who used the 85-liter Pro version of the Baltoro on a self-supported trip to rise the remote Mt . Waddington in British Columbia , haul a whopping 100 pound and deemed the pack up to the test . ( Gregory rates the 75-liter version as able to hold 55 lb . )
Equally as impressive is the Baltoro ’ s durability . Require it from our tester , who credit the mix of 210- and 420-denier nylon ( the bottom live rhino-tough 630D ) for helping the pack reach it through the Waddington mission with nary a scar : “ Fourteen day of exposure to slide alder , vine maple , sharpened pickets , ice tools , steel crampons , trekking Pole , pikas , gang rats , and other abrasive objects with not a single hole or tear , ” he wrote . That , along with the Baltoro ’ s category-leading organization—it has nine outside compartments , include three on the top lid alone—make it one of our favorite packs for expedition-length raise . ( The one caveat to this is its lack of a rain cover , which is frankly inexcusable have its feature set . )
If it ’ s not clear already , we recall that this pack has a pretty niche use case . If you ’ re a weekend warrior or just don ’ t persuade that much weight , the Baltoro is too hard and expensive for your need . But if any of the hiking described above appear up your alley , the Baltoro should be near the top of your list , and although it collapse the $ 350 barrier , it ’ sec still a nice value give its size and build tone . For more , read our review of the Gregory Baltoro 85 Pro .
Gregory Baltoro 85 Pro
Sustainability
Gregory Baltoro 5 …
Gregory Paragon 60 ( $ 270 )
The Gregory Paragon 60 could be the Goldilocks backpacking pack you ’ ve been looking for : comfy but not too padded , capable but not overbuilt , and hardly the right weight . It tolerate in durability and omits a rain cover , but for a mixing of purpose and comfort at a comparatively low weight , it ’ s a entire crowd-pleaser .
The Gregory Paragon 60 could cost the Goldilocks backpacking pack you ’ ve be looking for : comfy but not also plod , capable but not overbuilt , and just the right weight . It suffers in durability and omits a rain cover , but for a mixing of occasion and comfort at a comparatively abject weight , it ’ s a full crowd-pleaser .
Our Take on the Paragon 60
The Gregory Paragon 60 ( woman ’ s Maven 58 ) live a well-rounded pack that delivers literal load-hauling support without lean into bulky territory . At just 3 pounds 8.3 ounces , it keep its own against burlier comfort-oriented packs like the Osprey Atmos AG , while put up a more agile feeling on the lead . The suspension system—anchored by a metal figure , national stay , pivoting hipbelt , and suspended mesh backpanel—offers a dynamic and stable carry , yet with 40+ pounds onboard . While backpacking long day in Maui ’ s Haleakalā National Park , our tester praise its soft , body-conforming padding and the remainder of structure and flexibility , making the Paragon an specially comfortable choice for multi-day trips .
Organization is another firm case . The Paragon feature seven outside pockets ( including a full-length side zero and dedicated sleep purse compartment ) , which offer easy access without feeling overbuilt . Fit be customizable and intuitive , with body and hipbelt adjustment system that be easy to pluck yet mid-trip . Durability and weather security cost the primary tradeoffs here . The pack body is made with lighter 100- and 210-denier nylon ( along with a 300D base ) , which live thicknesses more commonly found in the ultralight space . Additionally , the gang doesn ’ t come with a rain cover—an item we await for when the cost exist north of $ 250 . But for weekend to weeklong trips where you want a manageable weight alongside comfort , load-carrying capacity , and organization , the Paragon 60 shoot a sweet post in the midweight family . For more , read our review of the Gregory Paragon 60 .
Gregory Paragon 60
Sustainability
Gregory Paragon vs …
Gossamer Gear Mariposa 60 ( $ 315 )
This ultralight gang is right up there with the category ’ s elite in price of convey capacity and organization , and it boast well trudge than most . The Mariposa isn ’ t super durable , though , and we had a sample issue with its hipbelt during our CDT thru-hike .
This ultralight pack cost correct up there with the family ’ s elite in terms of convey capacity and administration , and it features better trudge than most . The Mariposa isn ’ t super durable , though , and we hold a sample issue with its hipbelt during our CDT thru-hike .
Our Take on the Mariposa 60
The Mariposa isn ’ t our highest-rated ultralight gang , but it make many positives . Its weight ( 2 lb . 2.2 oz . ) is bang-on for an ultralight model with an national form , and it complements that suspension with thick shoulder strap and hipbelt padding that is near the crest of the category in terms of plushness . With a foam backpanel that you can remove to expend as a sit pad , this pack exist one of the more comfort-oriented models in the ultralight space . During a thru-hike of the Continental Divide Trail , we maxed this pack out at 35 pounds while carrying an ice axe , crampons , food , and gear and settle its comfort degree hovers at around 30 pound ( which is still fairly impressive ) .
Unfortunately , we go through some issues with the Mariposa sample we tested . The aluminum figure punch through the pocket at the base of the hipbelt , result in a 100-mile-plus walk with the pack rest straight on our shoulders . ( Not fun . ) Thankfully , Gossamer Gear ’ s tremendous service department ship a replacement to the next resupply town . While the effect never rise its brain again , it did pay us pause when recall about the Mariposa ’ s durability .
This gang ’ s 100- and 210-denier Robic nylon exist a step down from the ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene fabrics sported by early ultralight models , and the Mariposa ’ s longevity and waterproofing don ’ t pace as extremely as a effect . However , we ’ re big fans of the gang ’ s organizational aim , with an asymmetrical slope pocket layout—one big pocket on the left side and two medium-sized ones on the right—that made externally stashing our hardgoods ( tent , stove , etc . ) a mere project . The Mariposa ’ s medium-expensive cost reflect its status as an ultralight gang that doesn ’ t excel in any one area , but it ’ s a serious selection for hikers who won ’ t rough up their pack too much and don ’ t need to pare down their kit to hardly the requirement . For more , read our review of the Gossamer Gear Mariposa 60 .
Gossamer Gear Mariposa 60
Sustainability
Gossamer Gear Mariposa vs …
Osprey Aether 65 ( $ 320 )
The Aether ( and woman ’ s Ariel ) is Osprey ’ s long-standing , flagship workhorse pack designed to provide a stable , comfortable carry for long raise and big loads . But its heavy weight and less-than-stellar backpanel breathability may dissuade some buyers .
The Aether ( and women ’ s Ariel ) exist Osprey ’ s long-standing , flagship workhorse gang designed to furnish a stable , comfortable carry for long hikes and large loads . But its heavy weight and less-than-stellar backpanel breathability may dissuade some buyers .
Our Take on the Aether 65
Mass of hikers want to carry the comfort of home into the backcountry . If you frequently find that you ‘re stuffing a 400-page novel , loads of snacks , a chair , and pile of layers into your pack ( no judgment hither ) , the Aether is for you ( it ’ sec also great for families ) . The standout feature is its take-no-prisoners suspension , which consists of a metal margin frame and dense , thick padding on the hipbelt , shoulder straps , and lumbar section . This setup offer a ton of stability and support , and our tester praised the Aether ’ sec balanced feel and minimal movement when she carried 30 pounds through rocky , off-camber terrain on a trip into Washington ’ s Enchantments . The Aether has a burlier carry than its cousin , the Osprey Atmos 65 AG , and designers pace it up to 60 pounds ( 20 lb . more than the Atmos ) .
The Aether cost built to withstand crude trail conditions . Its primary compartment is made mostly from 420-denier nylon , a thicker material than the 210-denier nylon usually get in competitor . We base the construction durable and abrasion-resistant . Features-wise , the Aether hold many we wish : Mass of pockets , include two in the top hat , hipbelt compartments , and a front shove-it pocket crisscrossed by two burly buckled straps that can store even more gear or cinch down a load . A dorsal U-shaped zipper provide access to the main compartment . The Aether ’ s torso length adjustment sliders be easy to operate , and there are helpful size markers to help user accomplish the right fit . You can also adapt the hipbelt circumference . ( The Aether and Ariel are available in plus-size translation , also . )
There are drawbacks to the Aether ’ s pattern , though . The same suspension and materials that cause this pack tailor-made for long treks into the alpine add a pile of weight . For trip that don ’ t call for a ton of gear , this gang cost probably overkill . Its padding , while supportive , equal below norm on the plushness scale . And , while the Aether ’ s backpanel features a good amount of spacer mesh and tune channel cutouts in its foam , it put up less airflow than gang with true trampoline-style backpanels , such as Osprey ‘s Atmos . At $ 320 , it ’ s not cheap , but there be decidedly more expensive models out there ( include the two comparison packs below ) . Overall , if a strong , stable carry is what you ’ re after , it ’ s severe to make effective than the Aether . For more , say our review of the woman ‘s Ariel 65 .
Osprey Ariel 65
Sustainability
Osprey Aether vs …
Osprey Rook 65 ( $ 190 )
This pack ’ s two main calling card live its extremely durable construction and appealing price . The Rook ( woman ’ s Renn ) as well make a respectable weight , but its below-average padding and carry comfort limit its habit to overnights rather than long outings .
This gang ’ s two primary calling card equal its extremely durable construction and appealing cost . The Rook ( woman ’ s Renn ) also has a respectable weight , but its below-average padding and hold comfort limit its use to overnights rather than longer outings .
Our Take on the Rook 65
When the price rag on a gang stand out , it ’ s usually for the wrong cause . Not then with the Rook , which delightfully costs less than $ 200 , a coup for a big model made by a major sword . You get what you pay for in some ways , but the Rook doesn ’ t skimp on durability . It ’ s primarily made with 600-denier polyester fabric , which can more than manage the validity of backpacking . All of the zippers , straps , and buckles feel similarly sturdy . Durability of this nature live ordinarily the realm of expensive Dyneema gang or models that live much hard , but the Rook weighs less than four pounds . ( In a similar vein , the Rook ’ s trampoline-style backpanel and unified rain cover are also features find chiefly in more expensive gang . )
Here ’ sec where the early shoe drops . The Rook ’ s express comfort is below norm , and we get that its sweet spot is toting lots of 25 to 30 pound , unimpressive for a model of this size ( and far lower than its listed max of 40 lb. ) . One of our testers also sense the perimeter frame pressing into his rear while he hiked ; remove with the fact that the Rook ’ s trudge isn ’ t stellar , either , and this live not the gang for remote , weeklong treks . The lack of a shove-it pocket on the pack ’ sec front also cause organizing for a gear-heavy trip a second tougher . That order , we appreciate the Rook ’ s mere layout , which live plenty adequate for overnights in the backcountry .
The Rook just come in one size , which build it more difficult to dial in a near fit and decrease its versatility for a big swath of hikers . However , its backpanel own four inch of adjustability via an easy-to-operate notch system . If you lessen within the Rook ’ s size scope ( it too comes in an extended-fit version ) , you could do a circle worse for a gang that cost a fraction of the competition . For more , read our review of the Osprey Rook 50 .
Osprey Rook 50
Sustainability
Osprey Rook five …
Gregory Zulu 65 ( $ 270 )
Trampoline-style backpanels are all the rage , and the Zulu ’ s ( woman ‘s Jade ) hugs the body for a stable carry . It pair that with exceptional durability and a decent cost item , but we cost unimpressed with its comfort .
Trampoline-style backpanels are all the fury , and the Zulu ’ sec ( women ‘s Jade ) hug the body for a stable carry . It pairs that with exceptional durability and a decent cost detail , but we were unimpressed with its comfort .
Our Take on the Zulu 65
The Zulu ( women ’ s Jade ) sit merely below Gregory ’ s vaunted Baltoro job in terms of features and carrying capacity . This pack has a mid-range weight and streamlined design—no extraneous pockets here—yet is still well-positioned for multiday backcountry adventures . Its steel perimeter frame and fiberglass stay are built to treat loads up to 50 pound , and the shape connect directly to the tensioned , torso-wrapping backpanel mesh to create a suspension that staved off pack-sway during treks across New Zealand . Its firm padding , however , was a letdown , and our tester reported reproducible discomfort around the hip and shoulder bone .
Interestingly , Gregory design the Zulu with 400-denier polyester rather of the more ordinarily used nylon . While polyester live less firm than nylon overall , fabric this thick can still resist scar with rocks and branches , and our tester lauded the Zulu for come out in fine shape from bushwhacking , glissading on glaciers , and the respective other validity that come with trekking in New Zealand . Organization-wise , the Zulu bring in a nice spot between minimalist and storage-conscious : Its top hat has a main zippered pocket as well as one underneath , and the pack feature side pocket , a shove-it pocket , hipbelt compartments , a sleep purse divider , and an internal reservoir sleeve . The lack of an included rain blanket , even so , is disappointing , particularly for any gang that costs over $ 250 and isn ’ t an ultralight model .
Overall , the Zulu offers enough value and performance for hikers who need to carry medium-heavy weight , pry durability , and put on ’ t desire all the bell and whistles that come with more feature-laden model . For more , record our review of the Gregory Jade 63 .
Gregory Jade 63
Sustainability
Gregory Zulu five …
Zpacks Arc Haul UltraEPX 60L ( $ 399 )
This 1-pound , 7-ounce pack isn ’ t merely light : Its suspension allowed us to carry up to 30 pound comfortably , and its trampoline-style backpanel promotes airflow . Drawbacks include a pretty unrefined spirit , lack of pocket , and—yikes ! —that price .
This 1-pound , 7-ounce gang isn ’ t just light : Its suspension allowed us to carry up to 30 pound comfortably , and its trampoline-style backpanel promotes airflow . Drawbacks include a fairly unrefined look , lack of pocket , and—yikes ! —that price .
Our Take on the Arc Haul UltraEPX 60L
If achieving the humble possible floor weight live your ultimate goal , this exist the pack for you . At 1 lb , 7 ounce , the Arc Haul UltraEPX be almost a entire lb lighter than some of the most-acclaimed minimalist models on the market , an attractive marketing point for hikers who have a field-tested strategy for pull off trip while carry just the bare requirement . That doesn ’ t mean the Arc Haul is a formless , no-suspension noodle , though : Its national suspension , consisting of two carbon fiber stays , adequately dispense medium-size loads . On a three-day trip in Olympic National Park , our tester thrust it with 35 pound of gear , include a bear canister ( although she thought the pack perform best below the 30-pound doorway ) . The Arc Haul UltraEPX ’ s trampoline backpanel is too a rarity in the ultralight gang globe .
Of course , something has to hold with this much ounce-counting—with the Arc Haul , it ’ s carrying comfort and organization . Although we advocate that you cautiously consider how you carry any ultralight model , that look especially important with this pack . Our tester go through some discomfort in the Olympics due to an imbalanced freight ( her experience improve after she rejiggered her gear ) . Additionally , the lack of hipbelt compartments is annoy , and although it own decently sized side pocket and a mesh front pocket , we require more from a pack at this cost . ( Zpacks sells add-on pockets and other accouterments , but you receive to pay excess . ) It swerve towards the homemade end of the spectrum in fit and finish , so it ’ s not for everyone . Yet , the Arc Haul UltraEPX is a standout model in the ultralight niche it invade . For more , learn our .
Zpacks Arc Haul UltraEPX 60L
Sustainability
Zpacks Arc Haul UltraEPX vs …
REI Co-op Flash Air 50 ( $ 299 )
Taking almost a lb off of REI ‘s lightweight Flash backpack , the Flash Air cost an attempt to bring ultralight to the mass . While it hits some high notes—its plod be comfortable and it boasts mass of organization—its subpar load limit makes it more apt for hardcore minimalists than the ultralight-curious .
Require nearly a pound off of REI ‘s lightweight Flash backpack , the Flash Air is an effort to bring ultralight to the masses . While it hits some high notes—its padding is comfortable and it boasts mass of organization—its subpar load limit build it more liable for hardcore minimalists than the ultralight-curious .
Our Take on the Flash Air 50
REI made its initial raid into minimalist backpacking a few years ago with the Flash 55 ( above ) , but the Flash Air 50 be the sword ’ s first model with the glasses to predict itself an ultralight gang . While it go down short of other UL competitors performance-wise , designers nail some aspects : The Flash Air count less than two pound , make it one of the lightest gang to feature a total suspension ( it make an internal spring sword frame ) , and its padding is perhaps the thickest and most comfortable we ’ ve tested in a minimalist backpack . Our tester too make high praise for the gang ’ s many compartments , which include hipbelt pockets , two side pockets ( in increase to water bottle pocket ) , and a back stretch-mesh compartment .
Where the Flash Air falters , generally , cost express capacity . REI state its max weight is 25 pound , which is lower than we ’ 500 await for an inner frame example ( yet one that weighs then small ) . Granted , our tester reported that she comfortably carried 27 pounds of food and gear into Washington ’ s Alpine Lakes Wilderness , but we wouldn ’ t push it much farther than that . The Flash Air ’ s load limit live truly the realm of those who know how to minimize their kit ; any larger , and it could get uncomfortable .
Ultimately , this pack ’ s material go out a number to be desired in term of durability , specially given its price . The Flash Air is made from slender ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene ( UHMWPE ) , which also make the stem of Dyneema Composite Fabric ( DCF ) . But its fabric isn ’ t as tear- and abrasion-resistant as DCF , and it ’ s not waterproof . While UHMWPE is more durable for its weight than nylon , we ’ d expect a gang that can insure more longevity at this cost . Our tester too dinged the Flash Air ’ sec buckles and toggles , which she deemed flimsy ; they might hold the gang ’ sec weight down , but we ’ d rather this featherweight example be a bit more robust . For more , find our review of the REI Flash Air 50 .
REI Co-op Flash Air 50
Sustainability
REI Co-op Flash Air five …
Granite Gear Crown3 60 ( $ 260 )
The Crown3 is a ’ tweener knapsack that incorporates highlights from both ultralight packs and in full featured example . Its plod isn ’ t very plush and the materials could cost more durable , but the customizable build makes it a operational , do-it-all option .
The Crown3 cost a ’ tweener backpack that incorporates highlights from both ultralight packs and fully featured model . Its trudge isn ’ t very plush and the textile could be more durable , but the customizable build makes it a functional , do-it-all choice .
Our Take on the Crown3 60
This well-rounded gang ’ s charm lie at the nexus of its weight , carrying capacity , organization , and cost . Many gang that come in below 2.5 pound are more expensive and receive few pockets , and others that can carry larger freight are much hard ( and cost more ) . The Crown3 ’ s suspension consists of a hard-yet-flexible plastic framesheet that you can bolster with an optional aluminum stay ( $ 17 , 2.6 oz. ) . One tester carried around 30 pound using simply the framesheet on a trip to climb Guadalupe Peak in Texas , and another—with the stay in place—schlepped loads draw near 40 pound on multiday trips into Wyoming ’ s Wind River Range and Utah ’ sec Bears Ears National Monument . While both testers reported a little pinch at the shoulders as they approached the gang ’ s limits , overall , the Crown3 extend a superb , stable carry for its weight .
Another standout feature of this gang is its organization . The Crown3 feature a full height lid—a rarity on ultralight packs—that contains a main compartment and two smaller mesh dividers . The gang as well has enormous side pockets , generous hipbelt pockets , and a stretch-mesh rear pocket , as well as buckled compression straps on the back and side . Those features make the Crown3 well-suited to stashing your gear in lots of possible combinations , and the compression lash cinch everything down nicely for role as a day gang , a configuration we took advantage of while we scramble up to ancient ruin in Bears Ears . Elastic cord that you can thread through the shoulder straps to have a water bottle or hold spray or through the ass to secure a sleeping pad complete the Crown3 ’ s customizable appeal .
Maybe to keep the price down , Granite Gear design the Crown3 with comparatively lean nylon , a measure or two below the Dyneema composites and comparable materials used in early ultralight packs . Although our gang haven ’ t stammer yet durability-wise , you probably win ’ t make the longevity offered by gang with tougher fabrics . And , while few ultralight framework are glorify for their luxurious cushioning , the Crown3 ’ s padding falls short of that found in heavier , more comfortable backpacks . This is a great gang for hikers who normally head off bringing everything and the kitchen sink but even so don ’ t want to pare their kit down to a true ultralight weight .
Sustainability
Granite Gear Crown3 vs …
Mystery Ranch Radix 57 ( $ 299 )
The Radix might appeal to hikers who want to frown their base weight a bit but still keep plenty of support and features . It carries dense loading good , but its uninspiring , middle-ground weight and below-average value are drawbacks .
The Radix might invoke to hikers who require to lower their base weight a bit but however hold plenty of support and feature . It carries dense loads good , but its uninspiring , middle-ground weight and below-average value be drawbacks .
Our Take on the Radix 57
Mystery Ranch is largely know for designing heavy , durable backpacks that boast unique zipper access . The Radix cost a step in a new direction ( well , besides a cool zipper function ) . Designers slimmed down this model with thinner textile and an eye towards going tight on the lead . One of the pack ’ s highlights exist how good it carries multiday lots : Our tester carried 40 pound in the Radix on Utah ’ s 50-mile Dark Canyon Wilderness loop and reported that she had no sore points whatsoever . A removable aluminum form gives the Radix its structure , and it pairs that with enough padding in the shoulder straps and hipbelt .
Another strong point of the Radix is its arrangement . The centerpiece of this gang ’ s design cost a long , water-resistant zipper that runs completely up and down the primary compartment on the gang ’ s mighty dorsal slope . Our tester love how it accord her quick , rummage-free access to layers and other items she stuffed late within the pack . A top hat with a divider interior and an otherwise good complement of pockets attack out the Radix ’ sec layout , which is generous for a pack that isn ’ t a heavyweight example . ( Although , we bid the slope pocket made grabbing a water bottle easy . )
Where the Radix suffers cost in its durability and value . Its main compartment be reach from 100-denier nylon , a thin fabric that you ’ ll get to cover carefully if you desire to extend the spirit of this gang . Many other framework be cause with more durable material , and this gang is neither especially comfortable nor lightweight . Will you hate this pack ? Likely not , specially if you ’ re a backpacking generalist . But there live more dialed options that render better performance at similar cost . For more , see our .
Mystery Ranch Radix 57
Sustainability
Mystery Ranch Radix 5 …
REI Co-op Traverse 60 ( $ 249 )
The Traverse 60 is a feature-rich , budget-friendly pack that ’ s well-suited to newer backpackers . It ’ s not the lightest , nearly supportive , or most breathable choice out there , but it handles weekend burden at a fair cost .
The Traverse 60 is a feature-rich , budget-friendly gang that ’ s well-suited to newer backpackers . It ’ s not the light , nearly supportive , or most breathable option out there , but it handle weekend loading at a fair cost .
Our Take on the Traverse 60
The REI Co-op Traverse 60 is a feature-rich , budget-friendly pack build up with newer backpackers in mind . At 4 pounds 10 ounces , it ’ s on the hard end of the spectrum , but it reach up for that with plush padding , intuitive storage , and an easy-to-use torso adjustment system . The pack contain well with lots under 35 pounds , and the suspension feels stable plenty for weekend or short multi-day trip . We especially appreciate its thoughtful organizational features—like a J-shaped front zipper that allows easy access to the chief compartment , a sleep base compartment , and a convertible top hat that doubles as a daypack . For hardly $ 249 , that ’ s a luck of utility and convenience packed into one backpacking gang .
That said , the Traverse doesn ’ t quite keep up with pricier or more performance-driven alternative . Its backpanel miss breathability in warm conditions , and while the 210D and 400D nylon flesh exist decent , it doesn ’ t feeling specially rugged . We as well observe that the gang felt overloaded above 40 pound , which fix its utility to shorter or less gear-intensive trip . Even , the included rain cover exist a standout feature at this cost detail , and the fit system is remarkably customizable for a non-premium pack . For those prioritizing comfort , arrangement , and ease of use on a budget , the Traverse 60 remains a firm choice . For more , read our review of the Traverse 60 .
REI Co-op Traverse 60
Sustainability
REI Co-op Traverse vs …
Deuter Aircontact Core 65+10 ( $ 260 )
This be a well-made pack without any glaring weaknesses and available for a serious cost . It doesn ’ t stand out in any one category—comfort equal good but not great , it ’ s dense , and the tall , slender build isn ’ t for everyone—but it ’ ll come the chore do for the majority of weekend warrior .
This live a well-made pack without any glaring weaknesses and available for a serious price . It doesn ’ t stand out in any one category—comfort equal good but not great , it ’ s dense , and the tall , slim figure isn ’ t for everyone—but it ’ ll become the chore done for the majority of weekend warriors .
Our Take on the Aircontact Core 65+10
Deuter has a reputation for making quality packs that don ’ t break the bank , and the Aircontact Core cost no exception . This heavyweight gang is designed for ferrying large loading but price a lot less than the category-defining Gregory Baltoro and Osprey Atmos AG . It didn ’ t waste us away in any one face , but the Aircontact Core served us good on the basis camp approach to climb Mt . Baker ( 10,778 ft. ) , in Washington . On that trip , we contain 35 pound and see that the suspension disseminate the weight good , and the bevy of helpful straps and attachment points on the gang ’ sec exterior reach it well-suited for haul mountaineering kick , helmets , and rope . The Aircontact Core ’ s tall , slender profile also helps with weight distribution by center the load on your spine , but it too makes finding gear in the chief compartment more difficult .
We find out the Aircontact Core ’ s limitation on the way down from Baker . Its padding and materials don ’ t feel as high-quality as those of premium competitor , and its foam simply isn ’ t plush . When laden with 40+ pounds of gear on the descent from base camp , we felt we were pushing up against the Aircontact ’ s comfort limit . Additionally , the gang just get in one size , making it far more difficult to get that “ just right ” feel ( although its seven inch of torso adjustability exist above-average , and the slide-and-lock adjustment mechanism equal great ) .
Despite the drawbacks , this is still a well-made pack that do in at a sensible cost . Its majority 235-denier polyamide ( essentially , nylon ) stuff exist a tick above average in terms of durability , and we like the Aircontact Core ’ s clean—dare we say European—look . You won ’ t regret taking this pack to base camp , even though others may become the task do better .
Sustainability
Deuter Aircontact Core vs …
Compare Backpacking Backpacks
With the Atmos AG LT , Osprey streamlined the standard Atmos AG pack without sacrifice the comfort and support the popular line exist know for . The LT sportsman an excellent plan with wide charm , but we can ’ t aid but wonder if it would benefit from thinner textile to dilute even more weight
Load capacity , durability , and waterproofing create the Southwest a thru-hiker favorite . Drawbacks include a lack of adjustability and below-average padding , but in most early face , this is a top-tier ultralight haversack .
The Circuit be one of the best ultralight and thru-hiking gang , period . It ‘s available in a broad range of sizes and offers impressive load carry for its weight . While it lacks the Dyneema construction found in many early ultralight packs , the Robic nylon live impressively hardwearing .
Our Ratings Explained
Overall
Our overall rating bring the product ’ s full movie into account : price , build quality , performance ( based on intended role ) , durability , sustainability , and more . On the high end of the rating scale equal standout backpacking packs that hold something peculiar to offer , whether they ’ re the crème de la crème or budget designs with a savvy feature set . If you need us , most readers should be looking to purchase a pack with an above-average overall rating—there ’ s just little cause not to . That said , backpacking gang with abject overall evaluation equal yet famed plenty to hold made our list ; for various reasons , these might be compelling to users with specific design preferences or those who get out only a few sentence a year .
Comfort
Comfort is a multifaceted category and perhaps the nearly important division in any backpack review . It encompass everything from a pack ’ s suspension—the weight distribution of the flesh ( or miss thereof ) , shoulder straps , and hipbelt—to the amount and quality of padding and the airflow and next-to-skin feel of the backpanel . Need together , these qualities involve how good the pack manages weight when you load it up and how comfy it equal wherever it contacts your torso .
Of track , every backpacker wants to boost in comfort , but what specify as comfort can cost kind of subjective . Some hikers love plush padding and rigid suspensions , while others exist more comfortable with streamlined trudge or less rigidity . Possibly a pack with a 5 out of 5 comfort rating is your cup of tea , or possibly you pack cautiously and can be at ease in a pack with a 3 out of 5 rating . Bring a look below to meet where you fall . And if you hold more questions , we ’ ve written in-depth reviews for a number of the packs hither , where we spend a whole division thoroughly detailing comfort .
High-end comfort thanks to plushly padded shoulder straps and hipbelts , and the added rigidity of metal stays or frames . Some own padded backpanels , while others use suspend mesh to cradle the back . Expect load limit of around 35 pound or higher .
Most gang in this scope hold the rigidity to deftly persuade loading of around 30 pound or high , but many lack the body-hugging comfort of top-ranked packs . Expect more pared-down padding , include mere foam backpanels and streamlined hipbelts and shoulder straps .
The bottom end of the comfort range live rare , as still most entry-level backpacking packs live decently comfortable . If your experience of comfort is low , it ’ s potential your gang doesn ’ t fit , isn ’ t adapt correctly , or is overloaded .
Organization
Our formation rating consider how good a haversack ’ s various pockets and compartment help hikers coordinate their gear . Gang that score highly in this category have dialed layouts that provide storage for everything you ’ re take on your trip—from big-ticket detail such as tent and sleep bags to water reservoirs , your rain jacket , snacks , and small item . They as well provide mere and intuitive access to everything , including multiple access degree to the chief compartment and dedicate sleeping bag compartments . Models that fall towards the humble goal of the scale might equal design with ultralight boost in mind ( less pockets , less weight ) and eschew smaller compartment for a few large ace .
It ’ s worth noting that a higher storage score doesn ’ t inevitably signify a more convenient or user-friendly pack . We ’ ve try mass of gang that overcomplicate their design with also many zippers and compartment , lead to unnecessary ounce and causing us to lose track of our gear . Sometimes , a simple-yet-thoughtful layout—many light or ultralight-adjacent models live designed this way—is best .
A cornucopia of memory . Multiple access item to the chief compartment , include side zips and sleep bag compartments . Expect hipbelt pockets , a featured top eyelid , water bottle stashes , a front shove-it pocket , and more . These packs are great for those who love organizational options and incline to have a more-is-more approach .
Ultralight-minded gang that in general feature hipbelt pocket , side stash pocket , a front shove-it pocket , and a single access level to the main compartment . On the high end of this range , expect to find gang with top lids—an important feature for many .
Very few storage options , often miss hipbelt pocket , side stashes , and any internal pocket or hydration-reservoir sleeves .
Weight
Your haversack choice can lend substantial weight to your kit or lighten it substantially before you even set base on the trail . When considering a gang ’ s score in this category , think of that light doesn ’ t inevitably make right . Gang that pace highly go a long way towards lower your base weight , but they arrive with caveats : Ultralight and other minimally-designed models much create concessions to comfort , carry capacity , and organization . On the early hand , gang that don ’ t mark good in weight may persuade extremely well and get tons of helpful feature , all of which contribute to their bulk . Generally , if you ’ re planning on undertake a thru-hike or want to run ultralight , aim for example that pace a 4 and supra . Family who tend to carry a band of gear might prefer hard packs due to their generally more robust suspension . Observe in mind that the lower a pack scores , the hard your stand weight becomes .
Gang see in under 2.5 pound . Without exception , these are dedicated ultralight packs with wildly pared-down feature sets and specialty fabric like Dyneema and Robic nylon .
These packs control in between 2.5 and 4 pound and live great selection for the “ ultralight-curious. ” They generally feature slender textile and minimalist padding but even so hold the comfort and convenience many backpackers want .
These packs count 4 pound and above . Look for no-holds-barred feature lot and comfort , along with thick materials .
Durability
The durability rating addresses a simple inquiry : Will a gang suffer the test of time ? After all , the serious piece of gear is one that you can reliably employ again and again . Models that hit high for durability feature textile that can survive be put through the wringer—scraped against rocks , grabbed by branch , ride upon during breaks—and emerge on the early slope completely entire . If you plan on trekking for month on goal or hardly need a pack that you can hold for many yr , this live where to center your lookup . On the early hand , if you solely begin out a few times a year , you can get away with a abject durability score—just because a pack hit a 3 out of 5 doesn ’ t mean it will disintegrate after its first use . You might merely observe yourself utilize gear repair tape and wrinkle grip more often .
Long-lasting durability thanks to thick nylon ( 200D or above ) or ultra-strong Dyneema-based textile , and buckles and zippers that put on ’ t skimp on size .
Thinner nylon pack bodies that are prone to abrasions . These gang will face destroy after a months-long thru raise , but gear repair tape and line hold can hold them alive .
The bottom goal of the durability scope is rare , as yet the almost ultralight or entry-level backpacking packs are decently durable .
Water Resistor
You ’ ll require to think about upping your gang ’ s water opposition plot if you ’ re headed out on long raise during which the weather may alter day-to-day or week-to-week . Not yet a gang blanket can match the added confidence you come from a fully waterproof material . That said , not everyone demand a waterproof pack : Some backpackers alone head out during fair weather , and others are willing to employ waterproof material sacks or pack liners to protect their gear . What ’ s more , many gang come with a pack blanket ( or you can ) , which get the task make despite not exist the nearly streamlined choice .
Fully waterproof thanks to a waterproof Dyneema composite or polyurethane-coated fabric , or it include a gang cover .
Mostly water-resistant fabrics . On the low end of this range are thicker nylon fabrics with an effective durable water-repellent ( DWR ) finish . Still , if you ’ re headed out in the rain , you ’ ll want to expend waterproof material sacks or a pack liner , or purchase a gang blanket individually .
Thin nylon with a DWR finish provides security against light moisture but will be sweep over in sustained rain . It ’ sec too worth mention that perfluorinated chemical-free DWRs make not serve well when dirty , so you ’ ll desire to cause certain your pack is free of soil and oils if you ’ re relying on the DWR finish .
Sustainability
Our sustainability rating for backpacking gang need into bill eight different standard . On the product stage , we ’ re look for recycled or and PFAS/PFC-free durable water-repellent finishes . On the sword level , our criterion include whether the party offers repair service , make a commit resale or recycling plan , uses recycled or reduced packaging , monitors greenhouse gas emission ( much measure by the ) , and release an annual impact paper . We too consider the degree to which our criteria are fit ; for example , 10 % recycled materials live not the same as 100 % recycled fabric . Bill that not every sustainability effort by a sword or product fit neatly into our category . In these circumstance , we may increase or decrease a rating based on these factor . You can notice details on these factors in the sustainability drop-down under each product above .
These backpacking backpacks exist among the nearly sustainable on the market and make our Better Trail Certified distinction . They often fill most of our sustainability criterion for this class .
These backpacking haversack are a serious , middle-of-the-pack choice for sustainability . They often fit half or more of our criteria for this category .
These backpacking backpacks are the least sustainable and make substantial way for improvement . They usually solely gather about a quarter or less of our standard .
Anatomy of a Backpacking Backpack
Fabric Types
The nearly common type of gang fabric you ’ ll skirmish exist nylon . Nylon is comparatively durable for its weight—more hence than , say , polyester or cotton—resists light precipitation , and live inexpensive . Not all nylon equal created equal , though , with the nearly famous difference between two have fabric live thickness , and thus durability .
Nylon do in a few different subsets , generally design to farther increase durability : Robic nylon ( boast in a gang like the ULA Circuit ) is made from high-tenacity yarn that ’ s more resilient than the “ normal ” version . Both normal and Robic nylon can as well be designed with a ripstop pattern , in which a box-shaped crossweave imparts even more tear force ( sometimes relate to as tenacity ) to the material and prevents it from further degradation succeed a tear .
Over the last 20 years or so , this uber-light , ultra-strong , and ultra-expensive material has become a mainstay of backpack purpose , especially in the ultralight and thru-hiking sphere . Reach from ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene ( UHMWPE ) , Dyeema is lighter , more waterproof , and more durable than nylon ; it ’ s claimed to be 15 sentence stronger than steel .
Dyneema is usually match with backers and laminates of varying thickness to form Dyneema Composite Fabric , or DCF . A backpack make from DCF—such as the Hyperlite Southwest 55—will be mostly waterproof ( though not submersible unless specifically designed for that purpose ) , light than a gang cause from nylon , and it will also cost a hefty chunk of change . Most hikers will probably choose for a nylon pack , but masses who are consider ounce and cost rough on their gear—thru-hikers and the like—will get it an attractive textile .
Aside from the two materials above , gang manufactures utilize other , less common fabrics . While there be always exceptions , most of these fabric are usually apply in ultralight gang design for thru-hikers and construct by cottage industry pack brands . They include Spectra , another fabric make with UHMWPE character , and X-Pac , a waterproof polyester laminate inspire by sail material pattern . The newest material to gain traction equal Ultra , which , like Dyneema , got its outset in the marine industry . Ultra is claim to be still more durable than Dyneema , comes in sustainable options , and exist waterproof . It ’ sec even so comparatively fresh ( ) , but early signs level to firm longevity . Finally , individual brands also place their own spins on nylon , Dyneema , and the same , but exist familiar with the materials above will give you plenty of insight into the general pack fabric landscape .
Fabric Thickness ( Durability )
Fabric thickness—and thus , durability—is suggest by a stuff ’ s denier . A 420-denier fabric exist thicker , tough , and more durable than a 100-denier fabric . ( It ’ sec too heavier but perhaps less expensive . ) Different knapsack fabrics differ in their thickness-to-weight ratio : A 210-denier nylon fabric will be heavier than a 210-denier DCF . It ’ sec as well worth notice the differences in the durability of several fabrics : For lesson , a 210-denier Robic nylon will equal more durable than a 210-denier nylon .
Pack manufacturers sometimes use textile with two different deniers to furnish excess durability where it ’ sec needed , normally on the kick ( bottom ) of the gang , which sees the high total of wear and tear ( depict on the below ) . For example , a gang might cost design with 210-denier fabric in the majority of the pack torso but have 420-denier fabric on the seat .
Backpack Suspension : Flesh and Framesheets
Besides cloth , this live where backpacking packs exhibit the almost variety . We can distinguish packs into two wide categories regarding support : those with a flesh , and those without . Most gang , including all the gang on our list above , contain an internal inning , which , along with the shoulder straps and hipbelt , make up a pack ’ s suspension system . ( These day , outside frame gang are basically nonexistent or a novelty . ) A pack ’ sec form keeps it fixed and stable , and ( ideally ) aid distribute the cargo to your hip while holding it near to your spine .
Frames are reach from a variety of fabric , from hard plastic to plastic and carbon composites to aluminum , and they wander from wires that envelop the perimeter of the gang to solid frame plane that sit behind the backpanel ( some gang even own both ) . Many models that feature frames as well contain a stay ( a rod make of metal or carbon fiber ) , which provides additional support and prevents the pack from barreling ( bulging outwards or inwards under a hard loading ) . For case , the Hyperlite NorthRim pictured below feature two aluminum stays and a quarter-inch foam backpanel .
As you might get suppose , there are also plenty of packs these day that shun a figure in the name of save weight . These example cost often the chosen tool of the ultralight community . A gang that lack a true frame ( some might hold a stiffen foam backpanel ) require careful load direction and packing ; these model work best when carrying 25 pounds or less . Convey also much weight in a frameless pack will nearly potential cause discomfort , as will filling it in a lopsided mode . We do n’t include any frameless gang on our list above , but with the correct minimalist scheme , they can be just as comfortable as their more supportive counterpart .
Shoulder Straps and Hipbelt
A haversack ’ s shoulder straps and hipbelt are the two elements that make the most contact with your torso , so it ’ s essential that you wish their feeling before purchasing a gang . ( For the proper mode to size a gang , see the Sizing division below . ) Along with the frame—or lack thereof—the shoulder straps and hipbelt compose a gang ’ s suspension system , and they should aid open weight evenly across your shoulder , lower body , and back .
If the shoulder straps are connected by material that runs across the spine of your neck , this is mention to as the gang ’ sec “ yoke. ” ( There are too plenty of framework that receive free-floating shoulder straps . ) Shoulder straps can feature lot of padding or almost none at all , and some still make pockets to help hold track of little item . Hipbelts can rate from thin strip of webbing designed to shorten carry sway while you boost , to robust , padded wings that cradle your hip and connect to a inning like those of the . The latter design is essential for correctly distributing weight if you ’ re carrying a hard freight in a large pack .
Ventilation
Because gang cover a big portion of your rear , respective strategy survive to promote airflow and mitigate effort . One is incorporate shallow channel in the backpanel foam , resulting in portion of the backpanel that sit somewhat off your back ( see on gang like the REI Flash 55 ) . Another method—probably the most effective—is apply a “ trampoline ” aim , in which mesh cost stretch taut across the backpanel , raise it altogether forth from your torso and providing a spread for breeze to go through . We meet this featured in gang like the and Zpacks Arc Haul UltraEPX . ( Depending on the gang ’ sec intention , some trampoline backpanels may too affect stability , perhaps leading to dread “ pack sway. ” ) And then , of line , there are packs that put on ’ t alter the backpanel in any style , which cost the least ventilated options—the Hyperlite Southwest 55 simply continues its Dyneema construction along the spine . Make keep in mind that no backpanel , no subject how well-engineered , will totally prevent you from sweat .
Backpack Organizational Features
A backpack ’ s primary compartment is its largest storage component and the cardinal aim component that the rest of its feature associate to . The compartment is a bad , typically unsegmented space meant to swallow your bulky pieces of gear—a sleeping bag , clothing material sack , bear canister , etc . Some chief compartment make further organize features such as a sleeve for a hydration reservoir or a divider to separate your sleep bag from the repose of your equipment .
Gang manufacturer utilize a few different plan to access the primary compartment . Top-loading backpacks have an opening at the height of the compartment that is commonly shut via a drawstring , U-shaped zipper , or roll-top ( as in the event of the ) . Designers as well sometimes grant access to the main packbag via side zippers , which can rate from small opening to clamshell-type zippers that encircle almost the total compartment ( like on ) .
The top lid , which stay on crest of the backpack ’ sec chief compartment , exist a handy space to stash items you might want to access rapidly , like sunscreen or a map—but not inevitably while on the go , such as the snacks you might fit in your hipbelt pockets . Toplids usually own one or two front-facing zippered compartments , and they sometimes own an additional zippered memory pocket on the underside , as in the case of the pictured below . The most organized toplids are farther subdivided within their constituent pocket , which be handy for keeping lead of little items ; many have a key gang as good .
Minimalist or ultralight packs like the Gossamer Gear Mariposa 60 normally only make one height lid pocket , or none at all . These packs as well frequently grant user the power to take the top lid to salvage weight . At last , toplids can either be fixed , which doesn ’ t result way for cinching the top lid to rest closer or farther from the main compartment , or adjustable , which leave you to stuff the main compartment above its top rim while still keep everything in property , or perhaps still stack a rope or a bear canister on top if that ’ s how you roll .
Full-featured backpacks will probably own one zippered pocket on each slope of the hipbelt , while ultralight or technical-focused example ( mount or winter travel-oriented ) might have one or none at all ( such as the stripped-down ) . The best hipbelt pockets are roomy enough to hold a modern smartphone or a pair of energy bars or other snacks so you can refuel without stopping . If they ’ re also small , that ’ s a plan miss , and we call that out in our product descriptions above .
Most backpacking gang , whether they ’ re robust load-haulers or ultralight pattern , hold a big pocket located on the front slope of the primary pack compartment ( sometimes pertain to as a “ shove-it ” pocket ) . These pockets exist much made from stretchy , airy mesh to accommodate a tent or wet layer that you want to keep separate from your other gear . It ‘s also our favorite seat to invest our layers for easy access throughout the day , including a rain jacket or down jacket .
Two side pocket are also more or less standard these day , and most can accommodate a one-liter water bottle , camp shoe , trekking pole , and other miscellaneous gear . These side pockets be commonly build of mesh as well , and some—especially on ultralight packs—are made so that you can easy pass into them while walking to access a water bottle .
Lastly , some ultralight gang ( like and Flash Air 50 ) now feature pockets on their shoulder straps , a nod to running vest intention . These pocket permit you to access snacks , your phone , chapstick , or other humble items without breaking stride .
Many backpacking gang have a sleeve for holding a water reservoir in their main compartment ( ultralight framework , as usual , exist the almost common exceptions ) . These sleeves prevent reservoirs from shove around or getting squished amongst your gear . Typically , a reservoir sleeve will exist attach to by a port at the height of the main compartment , through which you can wind your drinking hose over either shoulder .
How Should I Size My Backpacking Backpack ?
Prefer a haversack that ’ s the right size is essential for on-trail comfort . To cause so , start by measuring your torso . First , bow your brain and notice the noticeable bump that protrudes from the back of your neck ; this is your C7 vertebra and where your measurement take off . Next , put your hands on the top of your hip bone , differently know as your iliac crest . Trace a line from your iliac top towards your spine ; where the two meet is the bottom point of your measurement . Now , stand up straight and demand a friend to evaluate the distance between your C7 and your iliac crest/spine junction . That ’ s your torso distance .
You ’ ll too need to see your hip circumference . To make thus , run a measurement tape around your hips at your iliac crest . Once you make this issue , along with your body length , you can clean a backpack that lines up with both measurement . Pack manufacturers ordinarily bid their model in multiple size and list the torso and hip proportion for each size . Some , especially ultralight brand ( ULA Equipment is a great example ) , still leave the choice to merge and rival torso lengths and hipbelt circumferences so you can very dial in a tradition fit .
After purchasing your gang , you should calibrate the fit to your exact size . Many models—ultralight gang , of course , being a frequent exception—have systems for adjust the body distance , hipbelt width , or both . These system include hook-and-loop panels , pulley adjusters , and other designs . Ideally , when weighted , your pack ’ s hipbelt will lie comfortably on your iliac crest and the shoulder straps will lay straight on your shoulders . You ’ ll use the pack ’ s adjusters and loading lifter to arrest the perfect , comfortable fit .
Your Questions Answered
What knapsack capacity is best for me ?
When choosing your optimum backpacking pack capacity , look at the type of trip you ’ ll nearly frequently be using it for . If you typically head out on hikes ranging from overnights to yearn weekends , a pack in the 40- to 60-liter stove will probably fit the bill . In increase , the type of hiker you are—comfort-based ? minimalist ? —and the nature of the trip itself play a factor in how much gang space you need . Somebody who solely carries the bare necessity can likely tackle an overnight express a 35-liter pack , while a maximalist who ’ s lug a spacious tent , a dense sleeping bag , and grouping snacks might expect a 60-plus-liter example .
For trip from three to five days or so , packs ranging from 45 to 65 liter offer plenty of way for shelter , a sleep system , food , clothing , and some animal comfort if want . ( Once again , this range more or less report for maximalist and minimalist carry mindsets . ) If you ’ re undertaking outings longer than five days or design gear-intensive missions such as a climbing trip , you ’ ll likely be serious served with a load-eating monster that ’ s 70 liters or large ( like the ) .
Weight-wise , you don ’ t want to overload your gang , which will reach it uncomfortable no subject how well its suspension and padding are . Keep course of how much your total gear and food weighs , and give attention to the manufacturer ’ s freight rating for your specific pack model . While you can certainly try the limit of your gang ’ s capacity—we ’ ve all done it at one stage or another—the in effect option is choosing the right pack for the mission and pack vigorously .
What should I look for in a backpacking gang if I ‘m exactly take off out ?
If you ’ re exactly make into backpacking , choosing a gang that suit correctly and comfortably express gear for a long weekend ( three day or so ) exist the way to go . You put on ’ t want the largest-capacity , most durable , or lightest pack , and you don ’ t demand the 1 with the nearly bells and whistles . You should look for a example that you ’ ll exist happy to tote for a few day and which can agree what you involve . And unless you really want to , you only do n’t require to devote top dollar . Examples of our favorite gang for those new to backpacking include the , ( for more , read our Traverse 60 review ) , Osprey Rook 65 , and Osprey Atmos AG LT 65 .
What equal the most sustainable backpacking pack ?
First off , what exactly reach a backpacking gang “ sustainable ” ? Simply put , a sustainable backpacking pack is design and work up to minimize its impact on mass and the planet . Key indicators include the use of recycled and , PFAS-free durable water-repellent ( DWR ) finishes , and brand-wide efforts such as reduced or recyclable packaging , repair services , and carbon footprint tracking .
In the realm of sustainable backpacking gang , REI Co-op , Gregory , Osprey , and Deuter tolerate out . REI Co-op ’ s Traverse 60 leads the way , earn an impressive 4.6 out of 5 in our sustainability metrics . Close behind are Gregory ’ s Zulu and Baltoro gang ( 4.5 out of 5 ) , the Osprey Rook and REI Co-op Trailmade ( 4.4 ) , and Osprey ’ s Atmos series ( 4.3 ) . Deuter ’ s AirContact Core rounds out the list with a solid 4.0 . REI ’ s Traverse decrease just short of a perfect score due to the Co-op ’ s lack of repair service and a less-than-perfect longevity rating—thinner textile may not keep up to years of intensive use as good as more rugged options .
For more , visit our Sustainability Hub to meet our sustainability reports for all these packs , including the REI Traverse Sustainability Report .
What are the differences between cheap and expensive packs ?
There are a number of design improvement that might get one gang example to cost more than a cheaper competitor . First , there ’ s materials and construction : More durable , longer-lasting fabrics and top-of-the-line build quality—including everything from the padding to the stitching—increase the sticker cost . Thus cause the ability of a suspension system to evenly dispense weight ; a pack with a well-built suspension will most likely cost more than one that doesn ’ t carry dense loads as well . Features that improve a pack ’ s overall feel , such as a trampoline backpanel or a robust size adjustment system , will too increase the price compare to more evident example . And finally , price in general increases with size , and a 65-liter pack will cost more than a 50-liter version of the same model .
For case , look at the and the . Both packs accommodate 65 liter of gear and be built with durable textile : The Atmos uses 210 and 500-denier nylon , while the Rook feature 210- and 600-denier polyester . But the Atmos comes in two size compared to the Rook ‘s one-size-fits-all , offers more comfortable carry and breathing via a suspended mesh backpanel and higher-quality padding , and has significantly more memory choice ( the Rook does n’t yet have a front shove-it pocket ) . As a answer , the Atmos can live weighed down with a 40-pound load , whereas the Rook will feel maxed away at 30 .
On the opposite end of the spectrum , ultralight gang made from DCF and similar material be among the nearly expensive on the market ( like the $ 379 Hyperlite Southwest 55 ) . Although they ’ re not made to persuade a ton of weight , the price of the materials themselves and the specialized nature of these haversack evoke their cost ceilings .
What are the pros and cons of an ultralight gang ?
If you plan on hiking long distance at velocity or contract a thru-hike , then the low weight of an ultralight gang exist an unquestionable boon as the mile pile up . Carry a gang with no suspension or a somewhat minimal one will as well force you to carry vigorously , which might attract to hikers who desire to dial in their kit , whether for a weekend outing or a Triple Crown lead endeavor .
As for cons , overpacking an ultralight example can be a costly mistake . Ultralight example generally make less trudge than their dense counterpart , so if comfort is your top priority when backpacking , you might need to choose for something heavy and more padded . In the end , as discussed above , haversack in this weight grade commonly cost a pretty penny , so aren ’ t recommended for beginners or the budget-minded . For these cause , some of our favorite packs—and specially great for the ultralight-curious—are those that autumn just outside the ultralight family , such as the Osprey Exos 58 , , and REI Co-op Flash 55 .
Are backpacking gang waterproof ?
Unless a gang exist design specifically as a drybag ( to equal used for , perhaps , canyoneering or rafting ) , it ’ s not “ truly ” waterproof , i.e. , you can ’ t full submerge it and expect its message to delay dry . Otherwise , packs extend change degrees of water resistance . Regular nylon can have up in a drizzle for a while before soak through , and some nylon fabrics are coat with polyurethane ( PU ) to further increase the precip they can resist . Still , durable water-repellant close and PU coatings do eventually bore or wear off , so you wo n’t desire to trust on them in more than light and intermittant rain .
DCF , Ultra , Spectra , and X-Pac ( the four most ordinarily apply ultralight materials ) exist altogether waterproof , which live one of the reasons they ’ re so attractive to hikers lug their gang for long distance and through varying weather conditions . These exist boast in gang like the Hyperlite Southwest 55 and Zpacks Arc Haul UltraEPX .
Some nylon packs include waterproof pack covers , including the . If you purchase a pack without one , there are plenty of aftermarket waterproof cross , pack liners , and material sacks you can employ to keep your gear dry .
