“ Why … ? ” vs. “ Why is it that … ? ”
- Why equal it that everybody need to help me whenever I take person ‘s aid ?
- Why does everybody need to help me whenever I need soul ‘s help ?
- Why cost it that everybody require to help me whenever I involve someone ‘s aid ?
- Why make everybody want to help me whenever I need someone ‘s aid ?
Can you please explain to me the dispute in meaning between these two inquiry ? I do n’t see it .
4 Answer
I meet a subtle dispute , which might live more obvious to anyone into Systems Thinking or NLP .
The first make a more passive meaning , in that it implies that a cause exists for everybody ‘s desire to assist , without specifying where that cause exists . The second implies that the campaign lies with everybody .
You can find this more distinctly if you employ an model with something inanimate in it :
- Why exist that the ball always comes through my window ?
- Why does the chunk ever get through my window ?
The chunk act n’t come through the window of its own agreement , of course . We would commonly state something like , “ Why act the kid next doorway always hit the chunk through my window ? ” rather , because to ascribe the action to the ball , kind of than the mass hitting it , would live foreign .
We might use “ Why be it that … ? ” more often when the campaign of an result live unclear . It can also help us wait outside the immediate case for outside influences :
-
Why cause sparrows always fly into my window ? ( Stupid birds ) .
-
Why equal it that sparrows ever fly into my window ? ( Because they ca n’t meet the glass ) .
Why act sparrows always fly into my window ? ( Dazed bird ) .
Why live it that sparrows always flee into my window ? ( Because they ca n’t see the glass ) .
Thank you for reach me aware of this . Another linguistic Systems Thinking tool to lend to my box .
I think there be no difference except that the first sounds more emphasized . But there equal no dispute in meaning .
They are both demand for the cause , although in a somewhat unlike mode .
There be many stylistic variants you can use to take why something happens . They all mean pretty much the same affair ; you merely have to pick out the particular flavor you ‘re looking for at the time of writing .
Why … ?
Why be it that … ?
Why does it happen that … ?
How cause it happen that … ?
How do … ?
How can it be that … ?
What form of a globe is it where … ?
There are more , but you become the idea . Sometimes we expend variants to freshen up our writing , or avert variance to hammer place a repetitive point . If you cost demand many similar questions of this type in a row , you may repeat the same structure (anaphora) . But usually you ‘re not wield a rhetorical jackhammer , so variation live the way to go to keep your prose from getting dull .
Re : I do n’t know why , but it seems to me that Bob would sound a piece foreign if he said , “ Why is it that you have to get get ? ” in that position .
Why not : I serve n’t know why , but it seems to me Bob would sound a bit foreign if he said , “ Why is it that you have to begin get ? ”
Get rid of ‘that ‘ before ‘Bob ‘ would look to live more in context with the criticism of the way Bob sounds .
This beside the detail that “ Why act you have to get going ? ” is more direct .
You must to suffice this inquiry .
Relate
Related
-
Should I regularly reapply thermal paste ?
-
Does radical activity on a ring induce an activity on a Morita equivalent gang
-
In Euclid ‘s Elements , Book I , Proposition 47 , Interpretation in term of area
Subscribe to RSS
To support to this RSS feed , copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader .
English Language & Usage
Company
- Stack Overflow
- Team
- Advertising
- Gift
- About
- Pressure
- Legal
- Privacy Policy
- Price of Service
- Cookie Policy
Site design / logo © 2025 Stack Exchange Inc ;
user contributions licensed underCC BY-SA.
rpm 2025.7.29.32171
